· Private foundation
The Community Covenant Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $210k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BONTON FARMS | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $40,000 |
| UMOJA PARTNERSHIP INC | $32,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS | $20,000 |
| NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| GLEANERS FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| MEN OF NEHEMIAH | $12,500 |
| FOSTER SUCCESS | $12,500 |
| LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| SEEDS OF HOPE INC | $10,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| CROSSFIRE KIDS | $10,000 |
| SEEDS OF CHANGE FREE CLINIC INC | $10,000 |
| FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC | $7,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $417k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches6× · 2020–2025 · $182k · revenue +38%
- UPUMOJA PARTNERSHIP INC6× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +140%
- LFLIFESAVERS FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $123k · revenue +85%
Funded once
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolisone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +20%- ININDIANA NATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…
To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.
Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc and the most unlike its peers is Crossfire Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds UMOJA PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC ↗
- Who funds Crossfire Kids ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds OUR FRIENDS PLACE ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds FOSTER SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS - MARION COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds Indianapolis Children's Choir ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Arthur Jordan Foundation · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Community Covenant Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.