· Private foundation
The Comis Foundation 2423-00-48
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k21 grants · $556k
- $50k–250k31 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Friends of the Children - SF Bay Area | $100,000 |
| Friends of the Children - SF Bay Area | $100,000 |
| Friends of the Children - National | $100,000 |
| Impact on Education | $100,000 |
| Kings Against Violence Initiative Inc | $80,000 |
| New York University | $75,000 |
| ETM-Colorado Inc | $75,000 |
| Community Education Network It | $75,000 |
| Music Will Inc | $75,000 |
| Boulder Day Nursery Association | $75,000 |
| National Black Womens Justice Institute | $75,000 |
| Mindful Life Project | $75,000 |
| First Graduate | $75,000 |
| Peninsula Family Service | $75,000 |
| Upower | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN2× · 2024–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +88%
- BDBOULDER DAY NURSERY ASSOCIATION4× · 2022–2025 · $190k · revenue +6%
- PPPARENT POSSIBLE3× · 2023–2025 · $168k · revenue +6%
Funded once
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +19%- JFJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +6%
- FCFlower City Arts Center Incone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.
Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.
Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…
The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
Childs path strengthens and enriches the lives of working families and underserved children in collier county through high-quality early childhood education. 1. provides tuition-assistance for children aged birth to 5 years old to ensure…
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Concordia place's continuum of programs support families throughout their children's development, from the neonatal period through college entry: home visiting for expecting parents and infants, early childhood education and care for…
Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…
The family school is dedicated to providing a superior environment of child centered academic and creative programs which inspire a joy of learning and support critical thinking. we strive to prepare students to be compassionate,…
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Buffalo Prep Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds BOULDER DAY NURSERY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PARENT POSSIBLE ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds LC AND LILLIE COX HAVEN OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Music Project ↗
- Who funds ETM-COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds We Care Services For Children ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY CENTERLA FAMILIA ↗
- Who funds IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER CITY LAX ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE AWARE OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds EARLY LEARNING VENTURES ↗
- Who funds Kings Against Violence Initiative Inc ↗
- Who funds 318 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UPOWER ↗
- Who funds National Black Womens Justice Institite Inc ↗
- Who funds Mindful Life Project ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRONIA ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds MUSIC WILL INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST GRADUATE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds Harmony Project Bay Area Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds Science and Entrepreneurship Exchange ↗
- Who funds PETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Chapter 510 Ink ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Flower City Arts Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Crescent Porter Hale Foundation · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Quest Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Tides Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Daniels Fund · The Denver Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Comis Foundation 2423-00-48 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
- The Complete Player Charity Ltd — 6% of income from government
- American Mural Project Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Comis Foundation 2423-00-48?
Find your warmest path to The Comis Foundation 2423-00-48 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.