· Private foundation
The Coleman Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $525k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA USC MARSHALL SCHOOL OF BUSINESS | $225,000 |
| ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| THE HONORABLE TIAN BROZMAN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE | $50,000 |
| THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HER JUSTICE INC | $30,000 |
| DEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| THE COCO POINT FUND | $25,000 |
| ODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOLS | $10,000 |
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF GREENWICH | $5,000 |
| GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND | $5,000 |
| BEST BUDDIES | $5,000 |
| RALLY FOUNDATION FOR CHILDHOOD CANCER RESEARCH | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YNYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL7× · 2018–2024 · $645k · revenue +47%
- PAPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College7× · 2017–2025 · $420k · revenue +47%
- THTHE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC5× · 2019–2023 · $275k · revenue +91%
Funded once
- AVAmerica Votes Education Fundone grant, 2024 · $100k
- TCTHE COCO POINT FUND IRMA RELIEFone grant, 2018 · $50k
- THTHE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FOUNDATION - TINA'S WISHone grant, 2018 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is B Cured Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds The Future Project Inc ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
- Who funds THE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COCO POINT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds America Votes Education Fund ↗
- Who funds HER JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RALLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ABILIS INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds OUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHED NYC INC ↗
- Who funds SOUNDWATERS INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND ↗
- Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CARES INC ↗
- Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
- Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds NORTH MAIN STREET FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Watt Family Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Old Stones Foundation Inc · Cornelia Cogswell Rossi Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Coleman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
- Pacific House Inc — 46% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Hill House Inc — 28% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Soundwaters Inc — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Coleman Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Coleman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.