Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cms Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$294kYouth Development$117kArts & Culture$78kHuman Services$50kInternational$32kCommunity Improvement$25kPhilanthropy$23kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$16,000
RIGHT FROM THE START$10,000
TURNING POINT MINISTRIES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
YOUNG LIFE - COLUMBUS$5,000
GLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE$5,000
GLOBAL EFFECT MINISTRY$5,000
LEADING THE WAY$5,000
TEEN CHALLENGE$3,500
INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES$3,500
TMS GLOBAL$3,000
AFRICA RURAL MISSION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
TRUTHSPRING (HIGHLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH)$2,500
COLUMBUS BAPTIST ASSOCIATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $1k → 14%JEEAH'S HOPE: $1k → 9%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $1k → 14%JEEAH'S HOPE: $1k → 9%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $1k → 14%JEEAH'S HOPE: $500 → 9%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $1k → 14%JEEAH'S HOPE: $500 → 9%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $1k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $500 → 14%JEEAH'S HOPE: $500 → 9%FAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE: $1k → 9%FAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE: $500 → 9%EQUIPPING AND ENCOURAGING CHURCH LEADERS INC: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IA
IN
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$651k · 53 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against -54% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
13

Total granted

$651k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-54%

Still filing today

53%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RIGHT FROM THE START
    7× · 2019–2025 · $52k · revenue +23%
  • GE
    Global Effect Ministry Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +20%
  • TS
    TRUTH SPRING INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +598%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
  • TP
    TURNING POINT MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • PE
    PINE EDEN CHRISTIAN RETREAT CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion
3
For Columbus

To inspire, gather, and activate followers of jesus to pursue the common good in our city.

Human Services
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

5
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
6
David George World Ministries Inc

Propagate the gospel of jesus christ through preaching at established churches; establishing new churchs, christian schools, and orphanages; supporting foreign missionary out-reach; provide training for pastors and lay-persons

Religion
7
Christianity Explored Usa

Christianity explored usa equips church's and individuals in evangelism by exploring jesus in the bible in a relational environment.

Religion
8
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
9
Gospel Revivals Inc

To engage in christian evangelism through the publication and worldwide distribution of "herald of his coming" periodical

10
Life in the Trinity Ministry

Our mission is drawing on timeless wisdom and the living word, we are a community serving the triune god and our brothers and sisters through study dedicated to encouraging self-knowledge and fostering spiritual maturity.

Religion
11
You Turn Ministries Inc

You turn ministries conducts christian evangelical ministries in the us and abroad.

Religion
12
Christian Ministries Inc

To serve christian ministries and individuals in their pursuit of a christian education.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truth Spring Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Wynn House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%11%<5yr17%11%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr15%29%20–35yr8%13%35–55yr10%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%3%<5yr17%14%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr15%33%20–35yr8%9%35–55yr10%20%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/43
the rest of the field
18%
1,881/10,404

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
19/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE HIGHLANDS INC — $53,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE HIGHLANDS INCWYNNBROOK BAPTIST CHURCH — $41,000 · OtherWYNNBROOK BAPTIST CHURCHFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $31,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYYOUNG LIFE - COLUMBUS — $31,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE - COLUMBUSIndividual grant recipient — $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLEADING THE WAY — $27,000 · OtherLEADING THE WAYAFRICA RURAL MISSION — $24,500 · OtherAFRICA RURAL MISSIONIndividual grant recipient — $21,500 · OtherNATIONAL CIVIL WAR NAVAL MUSEUM — $20,000 · OtherCOLUMBUS BAPTIST ASSOCIATION — $19,500 · OtherHISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC — $16,500 · Other+39 more — $144,750 · Other+39 moreGlobal Effect Ministry Inc — $38,950 · ReligionGlobal Effect…TURNING POINT COUNSELING INC — $37,500 · ReligionTURNING POINT…CHRISTIAN UNION INC — $4,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $4,000 · Religion+2 more — $1,000 · ReligionRIGHT FROM THE START — $51,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentRIVERCENTER INC — $11,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC — $8,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM FOUNDATIONINC — $8,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC — $6,500 · Arts & CultureCARILLON BEACH INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC WESTVILLE — $1,500 · Arts & CultureInternational Friendship Ministries Inc — $26,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC — $3,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyTRUTH SPRING INC — $22,000 · Community ImprovementGLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC — $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 · Health
Other$457,250Religion$85,450Youth Development$55,000Arts & Culture$40,000Philanthropy$35,000Community Improvement$22,000Health$21,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIGHT FROM THE START — $51,500 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetGlobal Effect Ministry Inc — $38,950 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTURNING POINT COUNSELING INC — $37,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Friendship Ministries Inc — $26,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetTRUTH SPRING INC — $22,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetGLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC — $16,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC — $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERCENTER INC — $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY RESCUE MISSION — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC — $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM FOUNDATIONINC — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL — $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARILLON BEACH INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN UNION INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEEAH'S HOPE INC — $3,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMICAH'S PROMISE INC — $3,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBrown Bag of Columbus Inc — $2,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY INCORPORATED — $1,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WYNN HOUSE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC WESTVILLE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVision Charitable Trust — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DREAM MINISTRIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANCIENT WAY FARM INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIGHT FROM THE START
  • Who funds Global Effect Ministry Inc
  • Who funds TURNING POINT COUNSELING INC
  • Who funds International Friendship Ministries Inc
  • Who funds TRUTH SPRING INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC
  • Who funds HISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds RIVERCENTER INC
  • Who funds VALLEY RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds SPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC
  • Who funds NATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM FOUNDATIONINC
  • Who funds THE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC
  • Who funds CARILLON BEACH INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN UNION INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
  • Who funds JEEAH'S HOPE INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley IncGA52.1× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · Bradley-Turner Foundation Inc · The Jordan Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Gb & Ca Saunders Foundation Inc · Jw & Ethel I Woodruff Foundation Inc · John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc · Beloco Foundation Inc · Swift Illges Foundation Inc · Mildred Miller Fort Foundation Inc · The Daniel P Amos Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cms Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Cms Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Cms Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph