· Private foundation
The Clinton Family Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k53 grants · $225k
- $10k–50k55 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k10 grants · $727k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AUDUBON FLORIDA | $103,000 |
| FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN | $100,000 |
| HOUSING CORP OF ARLINGTON | $81,000 |
| SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS | $78,000 |
| MAYWOOD FINE ARTS | $77,500 |
| MASS AUDUBON | $70,000 |
| SPHINX ORGANIZATION | $67,000 |
| HOUSING FORWARD | $50,000 |
| ABILITY HOUSING | $50,000 |
| NEW WORLD SYMPHONY | $50,000 |
| GREATER TWIN CITIES YOUTH SYMPHONY | $45,000 |
| PINE CASTLE INC | $45,000 |
| DENVER BOTANIC GARDEN | $42,000 |
| MIAMI CITY BALLET | $40,000 |
| CAN DO CANINIES | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $308k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
135 repeat relationships — 105 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $164k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FTFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC5× · 2020–2025 · $655k · revenue +40%
- PCPINE CASTLE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $234k · revenue +36%
- CSChicago Symphony Orchestra6× · 2020–2025 · $195k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- PCPULITZER CENTERone grant, 2023 · $150k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $75k
- FGFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…
The minnesota orchestra mission is to enrich, inspire and serve our community as an enduring symphony orchestra internationally recognized for its artistic excellence.
Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…
To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…
To be a sustainable musical institution that brings the intimate experience of a world-class chamber orchestra performance to the greater philadelphia area,enriching the musical life of the city and region by the integrity and excellence…
The mission of greater miami opera is to enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera. by expanding its reach to diverse communities throughout miami and fort lauderdale and wider audiences abroad creating a…
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To present the highest-quality performances of great music, bringing national and international distinction to the orchestra and its community; to delight and educate audiences of all ages and backgrounds, and enhance the cultural vitality…
The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bulldog Booster Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 200 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds PINE CASTLE INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING CORPORATION OF ARLINGTON ↗
- Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
- Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSONVILLE SCHOOL FOR AUTISM INC ↗
- Who funds AQUANUT WATER SHOWS INC ↗
- Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHLAND COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SPHINX ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS ↗
- Who funds SERAPHIC FIRE INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
- Who funds MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ABILITY HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
- Who funds FSHD SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAKI ALSOP CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Pga Tour Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Thomas M and Irene Kirbo Charitable Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Stellar Foundation · The Haskell Foundation · The Maryellen S Willis Charitable Trust · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Clinton Family Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bagly Inc — 39% of income from government
- Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
- Boston Area Gleaners Inc — 20% of income from government
- Ability Housing Inc — 14% of income from government
- Oregon Natural Desert Association — 9% of income from government
- Epilepsy Florida Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc — 4% of income from government
- Miami Music Project Inc — 2% of income from government
- Cathedral Arts Project Inc — 1% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
- Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Master Chorale of South Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Seraphic Fire Inc — 0% of income from government
- Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pine Castle Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.