Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Clementina Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITE PONY EXPRESS$100,000
THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS$25,000
CORAL GARDENERS USA$13,500
MANOA HERITAGE CENTER$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$8,500
A Enciso Litschi$6,500
REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL S$5,000
MANY HOPES INC$5,000
LAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION AND INFORMATION CENTER I$5,000
MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS$5,000
HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC$5,000
EMERGENCY FOOD BANK$5,000
HOMELESS CHILDRENS NETWORK$5,000
LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES$5,000
TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION$5,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $100k → 9%HOMELESS CHILDRENS NETWORK: $5k → 10%THE FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STAN SIAUS INC: $5k → 15%REDWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1k → 18%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $5k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
CA
AZ
TN
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Fresh Approach

The mission of fresh approach is to create long-term change in local food systems by connecting california communities with healthy food from california farmers and expanding knowledge about food and nutrition.

Food & Nutrition
8
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
9
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
10
Yolo Food Bank

The mission of yolo food bank is to make yolo county a thriving community where everyone has the resources they need to experience health, prosperity, and a high quality of life. Yolo Food bank durably increases food and nutrition security…

Food & Nutrition
11
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

12
Berkeley Food Network

The berkeley food network (bfn) works to expand food assistance services to food-insecure berkeley residents. bfn was founded in 2016 to help establish a foundation of good health from which all berkeley residents can pursue opportunity by…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Huckleberry Youth Programs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Coral Gardeners Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#13#14#4#17#9#16
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%13%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%39%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr13%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%7%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%65%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr11%8%35–55yr13%2%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,950

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
8/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WHITE PONY EXPRESS — $100,000 · Human ServicesWHITE PONY EXPRESSTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTSTHE FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHomeless Childrens Network — $5,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth Services — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesA Enciso Litschi — $6,500 · OtherA Enciso LitschiREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL S — $5,000 · OtherREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT C…EMERGENCY FOOD BANK — $5,000 · OtherEMERGENCY FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient — $3,613 · OtherIndividual grant reci…A Hazrati — $3,117 · OtherA HazratiA Amin — $2,315 · OtherJUSTICE IN MOTION INC — $5,000 · OtherJUSTICE IN MOTION INCLAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC — $5,000 · OtherLAVENDER YOUTH RECREA…MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS — $5,000 · OtherMERCY HOUSE LIVING CE…+7 more — $7,000 · Other+7 moreCORAL GARDENERS USA — $13,500 · EnvironmentTHE KOHALA CENTER — $1,000 · EnvironmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $8,500 · InternationalMANY HOPES INC — $5,000 · InternationalARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationTHE GLOBAL VILLAGE PROJECT INC — $5,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG — $2,241 · EducationMANOA HERITAGE CENTER FKA MANOA VALLEY CULTURAL HERITAGE FOUND — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $5,000 · Civil RightsBRAVE HOUSE INC — $1,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$146,000Other$47,545Environment$14,500International$13,500Education$12,241Arts & Culture$10,000Civil Rights$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORAL GARDENERS USA — $13,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Childrens Network — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLOBAL VILLAGE PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $2,241 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KOHALA CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVE HOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Foundation for Stronger CommunitiesCA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Clementina Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph