Skip to content
The Clement C Moore II and Elizabeth WY Moore Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Clement C Moore II and Elizabeth WY Moore Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$79k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$673kEnvironment$127kHealth$57kAnimals$28kEducation$24kInternational$18kFood & Nutrition$17kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $79k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Morgan Library and Museum$79,129
Sultana Education Foundation$15,000
City Harvest$10,000
Master Drawings Association Inc$10,000
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum$10,000
Planned Parenthood of NYC$5,000
Bates College Museum Of Art$5,000
Florence Griswold Museum$2,500
WNYC Radio$1,000
WYPR$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
WHYY Radio$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Friends Of Georgica Pond Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Friends Of Georgica Pond Foundation: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 49% of The Clement C Moore II and Elizabeth WY Moore Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Clement C Moore II and Elizabeth WY Moore Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$862k · 13 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
23

Total granted

$862k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+14%

Still filing today

85%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    The Pierpont Morgan Library
    7× · 2018–2025 · $549k · revenue +27%
  • SE
    SULTANA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $111k · revenue +36%
  • ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +39%
  • SP
    SULTANA PROJECTS
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF SOUTHBOROUGH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
4
Staten Island Institute of Arts and Sciences dba the Staten Island Museum

Founded in 1881 the Staten Island Museum engages visitors with interdisciplinary exhibitions, public programs, and educational activities for all ages. It is the mission of the Staten Island Museum to spark curiosity and generate…

Arts & Culture
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute

See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.

Arts & Culture
7
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
8
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
9
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
10
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frick Collection; the most unlike its peers is City Harvest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
23/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Pierpont Morgan Library: $548,529 · EducationThe Pierpont Morgan Library+2 more: $11,000 · EducationSULTANA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $111,200 · Arts & CultureSULTANA EDUCATION FOU…ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureISABELLA STEWART GARD…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM O…FLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC: $9,500 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $10,500 · Arts & Culture+5 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NYC: $52,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD…KENT CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 · OtherKENT CULTURAL ALLI…MASTER DRAWINGS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · OtherMASTER DRAWINGS AS…SULTANA PROJECTS: $13,000 · OtherSULTANA PROJECTSNETHERLANDS-AMERICA FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherNETHERLANDS-AMERIC…+17 more: $39,000 · Other+17 moreTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $27,500 · AnimalsCITY HARVEST INC: $17,000 · Food & NutritionSHORERIVERS INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $1,000 · EnvironmentMaine Coast Heritage Trust: $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $750 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · International
Education$559,529Arts & Culture$181,200Other$157,000Animals$27,500Food & Nutrition$17,000Environment$12,750International$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library: $548,529 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSULTANA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $111,200 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENT CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMASTER DRAWINGS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF SOUTHBOROUGH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATRE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHORERIVERS INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WESTERLY LAND TRUST: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENJAMIN FRANKLIN CUMMINGS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE PUBLIC MEDIA CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Schumann Robert F Fdn…Amica Companies Found…T Rowe Price Program …American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Renaissance Charitabl…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
Schumann Robert F Fdn-MainMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Schumann Robert F Fdn-Main · Amica Companies Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Clement C Moore II and Elizabeth WY Moore Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Clement C Moore II and Elizabeth WY Moore Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Kent Cultural Alliance Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Shorerivers Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Sultana Education Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology: 5% of income from government
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Florence Griswold Museum Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Clement C Moore II and Elizabeth WY Moore Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Clement C Moore II and Elizabeth WY Moore Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clement C Moore II and Elizabeth WY Moore’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home