Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Clark Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$150kEducation$109kHuman Services$96kHealth$54kAnimals$32kArts & Culture$23kHousing & Shelter$23kYouth Development$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESLEY MEMORIAL CHURCH$10,000
HOLY CROSS HEALTH$8,000
BOOKMARKS$6,000
GEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
COMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT$5,000
WESLEY MEMORIAL CHURCH$2,500
THEATER ARTS GALLERY$2,500
AMERICAN CHILDREN'S HOME$2,000
CAROLINA WATERFOWL RESCUE$2,000
TRIANGLE BEAGLE RESCUE OF NC INC$2,000
MISFIT HOUNDS$1,500
WESLEY MEMORIAL CHURCH$1,000
APERTURE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 16%MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 16%MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 16%MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 16%MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 16%MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $5k → 16%MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $2k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $275 → 16%FAMILY SERVICES OF THE PIEDMONT: $8k → 16%FAMILY SERVICES OF THE PIEDMONT: $5k → 16%SEVEN HOMES: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$497k · 24 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
14

Total granted

$497k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
0%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $47k · revenue +81%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +87%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • A
    APETURE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • JH
    JOYFUL HEARTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • WN
    WESTERN N C CONFERENCE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Humane Society of Harford County Inc

The humane society of harford county's mission is to promote the humane treatment of homeless, stray and abandoned animals by providing shelter, care, adoptions and community education.

Animals
2
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
3
Forever Homes for Paws Inc

Rescue, shelter, and humane treatment of dogs and cats primarily in the hardin county, ky region. spaying and neutering of rescued animals to prevent further abandonment

Animals
4
Peace and Paws

Charitable dog and pet rescue that focuses on dogs that require significantly more medical and behavioral care than average dogs.

—
5
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
6
Carolina Poodle Rescue

Rescue,rehabilitate, and rehome poodles, poodle mixes and other small breed dogs.

Animals
7
Tennessee Dachshund Rescue

Tennessee Dachshund Rescue is dedicated to saving homeless dachshunds no matter how old sick or abused.

Animals
8
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
9
Homeward Pet Adoption Center

Transforms the lives of cats and dogs in need through compassionate medical care, positive behavior trainings, and successful adoptions, while building a more humane community.

Animals
10
Paws Crossed Animal Rescue Inc

To aid in animal rescue and provide medical care, nourishment, and a safe haven for abandoned, abused, and disabled animals. to engage in education, advocacy and collaboration in its mission "to rescue one by one until there are none".

Animals
11
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
12
Homeward Animal Shelter Inc

To care for, protect and place animals for adoption in life long homes, and to prevent cruelty to animals by educating our community in the proper and humane care of all animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Service of the Piedmont Inc; the most unlike its peers is Triangle Beagle Rescue of Nc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESLEY MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CH: $111,100 · OtherWESLEY MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHAMERICAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $57,000 · OtherAMERICAN CHILDREN'S HOMEGEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $29,500 · OtherGEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCWESLEY MEMORIAL CHURCH: $25,500 · OtherWESLEY MEMORIAL CHURCHHIS LABORING FEW MINISTRIES INC: $19,050 · OtherHIS LABORING FEW MINISTRIES INCARCHDALETRINITY SERCO CLUB: $16,800 · OtherHOLY CROSS HEALTH INC: $15,000 · Other+22 more: $73,876 · Other+22 moreHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $46,748 · EducationHIGH POINT UN…BOOKMARKS INC: $11,500 · EducationBOOKMARKS INCThe Madeira School: $4,350 · EducationThe Madeira S…+1 more: $1,500 · EducationCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT INC: $38,800 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $19,775 · Human ServicesMACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER I: $8,000 · Human ServicesSEVEN HOMES INC: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCAROLINA WATERFOWL RESCUE INC: $17,250 · AnimalsMISFIT HOUNDS: $5,750 · AnimalsRED DOG FARM ANIMAL RESCUE NETWORK: $3,000 · AnimalsOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC: $21,500 · Housing & ShelterWEST END MINISTRIES: $16,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$347,826Education$64,098Health$39,300Human Services$31,275Animals$26,000Housing & Shelter$21,500Crime & Legal$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $46,748 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT INC: $38,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC: $21,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $19,775 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCAROLINA WATERFOWL RESCUE INC: $17,250 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetWEST END MINISTRIES: $16,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOLY CROSS HEALTH INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKMARKS INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER I: $8,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMISFIT HOUNDS: $5,750 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTriangle Beagle Rescue of Nc Inc: $5,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Madeira School: $4,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED DOG FARM ANIMAL RESCUE NETWORK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSEVEN HOMES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWARD STREET COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA WATERFOWL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST END MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HOLY CROSS HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOKMARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER I ↗
  • Who funds MISFIT HOUNDS ↗
  • Who funds Triangle Beagle Rescue of Nc Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Madeira School ↗
  • Who funds RED DOG FARM ANIMAL RESCUE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds WARD STREET COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hayworth FoundationFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hayworth Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Apat & Kathryne Lbrown Foundation · Foster Foundation Inc · A Simple Gesture - Greensboro Inc · Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Clark Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Clark Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clark’s filings →

    More from the funding graph