· Private foundation
The Clare Rose Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $282k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $416k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLARE ROSE FOUNDATION CENTER FOR CREATIVE YOUTH DE | $166,215 |
| CENTER FOR HOPE AND STRENGTH INC | $100,000 |
| GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SAN DIEGO | $50,000 |
| TRAUMA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| A REASON TO SURVIVE | $50,000 |
| LIVING COAST DISCOVERY CENTER | $45,000 |
| VILLA MUSICA | $45,000 |
| THE DAVIDS HARP FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL GUILD FOR COMMUNITY ARTS EDUCATION INC | $25,000 |
| THE AJA PROJECT | $25,000 |
| HIGHSTEPPERS DRILL TEAM INC | $20,000 |
| TRANSCENDANCE YOUTH ARTS PROJECT | $20,000 |
| ARTREACH | $15,000 |
| A STEP BEYOND | $15,000 |
| FERN STREET COMMUNITY ARTS INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRClare Rose Foundation Center for Creative Youth Development4× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +42% · 73% of their budget
- ARA Reason To Survive6× · 2017–2024 · $460k · revenue +48%
- GOGirls on the Run of San Diego6× · 2017–2024 · $300k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- FLFIELDSTONE LEADERSHIP NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $178k · revenue +114%
- CRCRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +9%
- AYACCESS YOUTH ACADEMYone grant, 2022 · $43k · revenue -75%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Arts Education Connection San Diego engages professional teaching artists to provide high-quality arts education programs in all art forms for students, educators, families and communities, advocating for, leading and advancing education…
San Diego Junior Theatre (Junior Theatre) was incorporated in 1948 as a nonprofit corporation and is the oldest youth theatre in the nation, offering affordable camps, classes, and outreach programs for children ages 3-18; as well as six…
Youth in Arts builds visual and performing arts skills through innovative and in-depth programs that foster confidence, compassion and resilience in students of all abilities. We develop capacity among educators and teaching artists,…
The San Diego Theatre Critics Circle is a nonprofit educational organization dedicated to reviewing and honoring the top achievements in San Diego professional theater. The organization is made up of 9 professional theater critics who…
Indian Dance Training Center (IDTC) is a community development organizationaimed at empowering the youth through cultural dance training of traditional SouthAsian dance styles as well as classical theater. IDTC provides trainings,…
To provide the youth of san diego with an opportunity to study, understand, and appreciate, through education and participation, the art of ballet, and to enrich the cultural life of the community.
Contra-tiempo is a bold, multilingual los angeles-based activist dance theater company creating physically intense and politically astute performance work that moves audience to imagine what is possible. We create a new physical, visual…
to advance regional contemporary art and artists while fostering cultural equity through access to meaningful art experiences
To produce radically inclusive programming at the intersection of advocacy education and entertainment that cultivates and celebrates new work emerging artists diverse audiences and fresh ideas. Transformative theatre that amplifies…
Slo rep strengthens theatre's cultural influence and enriches the central coast by producing professional theatre, nurturing artists and providing theatre education for children and adults.
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
Vanguard Culture is a volunteer-powered, inclusive nonprofit dedicated to advancing San Diegos Creative Industries. We provide quality arts journalism, cutting edge events, professional development that create arts jobs, bring diverse…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Guild for Community Arts Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fieldstone Leadership Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Clare Rose Foundation Center for Creative Youth Development ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE AND STRENGTH INC ↗
- Who funds A Reason To Survive ↗
- Who funds Girls on the Run of San Diego ↗
- Who funds The Trauma Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL GUILD FOR COMMUNITY ARTS EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds FIELDSTONE LEADERSHIP NETWORK ↗
- Who funds transcenDANCE Youth Arts Project ↗
- Who funds DAVID'S HARP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The High Steppers Drill Team Inc ↗
- Who funds THE AJA PROJECT ↗
- Who funds A Step Beyond ↗
- Who funds ART OF ELAN ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VILLA MUSICA ↗
- Who funds LIVING COAST DISCOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds KIDS INCLUDED TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA DE AMISTAD CENTRO DE ENSENANZA ↗
- Who funds ACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds Resounding Joy Inc ↗
- Who funds Fern Street Community Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties ↗
- Who funds Disco Riot ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds IZCALLI ESCUELA DE LA RAZA ↗
- Who funds ARTREACH ↗
- Who funds Rock n Roll Camp for Girls San Diego ↗
- Who funds TUYO THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MEDIA ARTS CENTER SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds Jason Mraz Foundation ↗
- Who funds Californians for the Arts ↗
- Who funds Playwrights Project ↗
- Who funds Bocon Inc ↗
- Who funds San Diego African American Museum of Fine Arts ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Parker Foundation · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation · Pratt Memorial Fund · Sempra Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The William Hall Tippett and Ruth Rathell Tippett Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Clare Rose Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Clare Rose Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Clare Rose Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.