Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Clare Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$148kHousing & Shelter$130kReligion$85kHealth$73kArts & Culture$69kHuman Services$69kEmployment$55kCommunity Improvement$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE BROTHERS$25,000
PROVIDENCE-ST MEL HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
THE GRAY MATTER EXPERIENCE$10,000
PAT MAC'S PACK$6,000
NEST COMMUNITY SHELTER$5,000
MAPLE MORGAN PARK FOOD PANTRY$5,000
BEVERLY AREA PLANNING ASSOCIATION$5,000
WINGS PROGRAM INC$5,000
MY BLOCK MY HOOD MY CITY$5,000
19TH WARD YOUTH AND COMMUNITY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BURST INTO BOOKS: $5k → 14%BURST INTO BOOKS: $5k → 14%THE PORT MINISTRIES: $30k → 14%THE PORT MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$964k · 21 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
7

Total granted

$964k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+23%

Still filing today

52%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The National Public Housing Museum
    4× · 2018–2021 · $85k · revenue +72%
  • BA
    Beverly Arts Center of Chicago
    3× · 2017–2019 · $69k · revenue +28%
  • TA
    THE ANDREW WEISHAR FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • PS
    PROVIDENCE ST MEL'S HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CT
    CAREER TRANSITIONS CENTER OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +13%
  • MS
    MARILLAC SOCIAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beverly Area Arts Alliance

The Beverly Area Arts Alliance (The Alliance) cultivates collaboration between artists and community members to foster Beverly/Morgan Park as a diverse hub of culture and creativity on Chicago's far Southside and a vibrant place to live…

Arts & Culture
2
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
3
Chicago Chapter National Black Mba Association

The mission of this organization is to create partnerships that produce intellectual and economic wealth in the African-American community.

Education
4
Black Arts & Culture Alliance of Chicago

The mission of the Black Arts & Culture Alliance of Chicago is to collectively advance Black excellence in the work of the Black arts and culture sector.

Arts & Culture
5
Beyond Hunger

Beyond Hunger was founded in 1978 to provide direct hunger relief services and harness the power of communities to end hunger through collective impact. During the year, with repeat visits 67,000 individuals were served across all…

Food & Nutrition
6
Chicago Hope Inc

Chicago Hope runs a food pantry twice a week that serves over 100 families. The organization is working toward the furtherance of wrap around services.

Human Services
7
Borderless Magazine Nfp

Borderless magazine nfp is a chicago-based nonprofit news outlet that is reimagining local immigration journalism for a more just and equitable future. we provide free, local and state news coverage to english and spanish speakers.

Arts & Culture
8
Neighborhood Food Pantries

Neighborhood food pantries is organized exclusively for the charitable purpose of providing food and financial relief for the underprivileged.

Human Services
9
Heaven Gallery

Heaven Gallery is a multi-disciplinary healing art space that provides holistic programming to elevate artists and connect Chicago communities. The gallery hosts art exhibitions, artist talks, House Music dance events, and classical…

Arts & Culture
10
Better Streets Chicago

Better Streets Chicago champions universal mobility by challenging harmful transportation infrastructure and policies.

Public Benefit
11
Chicago Cultural Performing Arts and Media Allianc

To provide outreach services and resources

Arts & Culture
12
Turpin Cares Nfp

To provide help to the homeless and nearly homeless

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friendship Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pat Mac's Pack Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE BROTHERS: $205,000 · OtherLITTLE BROTHERSST BARNABAS CHURCH: $85,000 · OtherST BARNABAS CHURCHPROVIDENCE-ST MEL HIGH SCHOOL: $59,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE-ST MEL HIGH SCHOOLGENYSYS WORKS CHICAGO: $50,000 · OtherGENYSYS WORKS CHICAGOHales Franciscan High School Inc: $49,000 · OtherHales Franciscan High School IncMAPLE MORGAN PARK FOOD PANTRY: $30,000 · OtherA NEW DIRECTION BEVERLY MORGAN PARK: $29,000 · OtherST RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL CORPORATION: $25,000 · Other+12 more: $112,000 · Other+12 moreThe National Public Housing Museum: $85,000 · Arts & CultureThe National Publ…Beverly Arts Center of Chicago: $69,458 · Arts & CultureBeverly Arts Cent…THE ANDREW WEISHAR FOUNDATION: $48,048 · PhilanthropyThe Port Ministries: $35,000 · Human ServicesBURST INTO BOOKS: $10,000 · Human ServicesWINGS PROGRAM INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterBeverly Area Planning Association: $40,000 · Community ImprovementPat Mac's Pack Inc: $29,000 · Health
Other$644,000Arts & Culture$154,458Philanthropy$48,048Human Services$45,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Community Improvement$40,000Health$29,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe National Public Housing Museum: $85,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetBeverly Arts Center of Chicago: $69,458 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHales Franciscan High School Inc: $49,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetTHE ANDREW WEISHAR FOUNDATION: $48,048 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBeverly Area Planning Association: $40,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetThe Port Ministries: $35,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetPat Mac's Pack Inc: $29,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetA NEW DIRECTION BEVERLY MORGAN PARK: $29,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetTHE GRAY MATTER EXPERIENCE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBURST INTO BOOKS: $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCAREER TRANSITIONS CENTER OF CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The National Public Housing Museum ↗
  • Who funds Beverly Arts Center of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Hales Franciscan High School Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ANDREW WEISHAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Beverly Area Planning Association ↗
  • Who funds The Port Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Pat Mac's Pack Inc ↗
  • Who funds A NEW DIRECTION BEVERLY MORGAN PARK ↗
  • Who funds THE GRAY MATTER EXPERIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Role Model Movement Inc (NFP) ↗
  • Who funds BURST INTO BOOKS ↗
  • Who funds CAREER TRANSITIONS CENTER OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL14.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Clare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Clare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Clare Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Clare Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph