Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Citizens Savings Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$317k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Human Services$416kFood & Nutrition$97kReligion$64kEducation$53kSocial Science$53kHealth$10kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $272,312 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $317,312 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$22,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sojourner Truth House$41,250
Haven House$41,250
The Caring Place$37,500
St. Joseph's Carmelite Home$28,562
Restoration Ministries$22,500
Bishop Noll Institute$22,500
Canpagna Academy$22,500
Crisis Center$22,500
Food Bank of Northwest Indiana$20,625
Food Bank of NWI - Food Back Program$13,125
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$681k · 10 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$681k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    Sojourner Truth House Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $121k · revenue +12%
  • HH
    HAVEN HOUSE INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $96k · revenue +34%
  • TC
    THE CARING PLACE INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $88k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • FH
    FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • RM
    Restoration Ministries - Art Center
    one grant, 2021 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CARING PLACE INC — $87,500 · OtherTHE CARING PLACE INCRestoration Ministries — $63,750 · OtherRestoration MinistriesCanpagna Academy — $52,500 · OtherCanpagna AcademyCrisis Center — $52,500 · OtherCrisis CenterBISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE — $52,500 · OtherBISHOP NOLL INSTITUTEFood Bank of NWI - Food Back Program — $37,625 · OtherFood Bank of NWI - Food Back Program+1 more — $6,250 · OtherSojourner Truth House Inc — $120,902 · Human ServicesSojourner Truth House IncHAVEN HOUSE INC — $96,250 · Human ServicesHAVEN HOUSE INCFOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC — $59,125 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK…CARMELITE SISTERSHOME FOR GIRLS — $58,562 · HealthCARMELITE…FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$352,625Human Services$217,152Food & Nutrition$59,125Health$58,562Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSojourner Truth House Inc — $120,902 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC — $96,250 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetTHE CARING PLACE INC — $87,500 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC — $59,125 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARMELITE SISTERSHOME FOR GIRLS — $58,562 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sojourner Truth House Inc
  • Who funds HAVEN HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE CARING PLACE INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC
  • Who funds CARMELITE SISTERSHOME FOR GIRLS
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lake Area United Way IncIN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lake Area United Way Inc · John W Anderson Foundation · Legacy Foundation Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Fulk Family Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Citizens Savings Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Citizens Savings Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph