Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cindy and Chip Murphy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$535k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$868kHealth$140kEducation$98kFood & Nutrition$76kHuman Services$70kAnimals$20kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $535k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$990k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST$535,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
THE ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE$35,000
ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ASSISTANCE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THEA FOUNDATION$10,000
LITTLE ROCK ZOO$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PULASKI ACADEMY$5,000
OUR HOUSE SHELTER$5,000
WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THEA FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THEA FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THEA FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THEA FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 76% of The Cindy and Chip Murphy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 44% of the giving stays in AR; read by stated purpose it is 26% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Cindy and Chip Murphy Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 15 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$1.3M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+1%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +35%
  • PA
    PULASKI ACADEMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $68k · revenue +35%
  • TF
    THEA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • AC
    ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue +1%
  • UW
    UAMS WINTHROP P ROCKEFELLER CANCER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • WP
    WILDWOOD PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Education Association

Advocate for educational professionals and unite our members and the state to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

Education
2
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families

Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…

Human Services
3
Arkansas Pharmacy Foundation

Promote profession of pharmacy in the state of arkansas.

Health
4
Arkansas Humanities Council

The purpose of the arkansas humanities council is to promote understanding, appreciation, and use of the humanities in arkansas. to achieve its purpose, the council awards grants through a competitive application process to nonprofit…

5
Arkansas Arts Academy

The mission is to provide a rigourous academic program with a purposed integration of the arts. challenging our students academically while providing them with an arts enchanced curriculum.

Education
6
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
7
Alabama Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics

Obtain optimal health & well-being for all children in alabama, and to provide educational and practice support for its membership so the highest quality of medical care can be achieved.

Health
8
Arkansas Community Foundation Inc

Arkansas community foundation engages people, connects resources and inspires solutions to build community.

Philanthropy
9
Arkansas Medical Society

Collects member dues which are used to advance medical knowledge, elevate the standards of medical education, and secure enactment and enforcement of just laws relating to the field of medicine.

Health
10
Arkansas Hospital Education and Research Trust Inc

Education & leadership training to improve patient care.

11
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
12
Opportunity Arkansas Foundation

Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arkansas Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pulaski Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST — $655,000 · OtherWOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRSTIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ASSISTANCE — $70,000 · OtherARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ASSISTANCE+5 more — $50,000 · OtherARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE — $120,000 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS RE…MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY — $17,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF D…PULASKI ACADEMY — $68,000 · EducationPULASKI A…WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $30,000 · EducationWASHINGTO…Accademia Dell' Arte — $20,000 · EducationAccademia…ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $45,000 · HealthEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS — $35,000 · HealthBaptist Health Foundation Inc — $5,000 · HealthTHEA FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Human ServicesARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY — $40,000 · PhilanthropyARKANSAS ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · AnimalsARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC — $6,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$950,000Arts & Culture$137,500Education$118,000Health$85,000Human Services$40,000Philanthropy$40,000Animals$20,000Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE — $120,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPULASKI ACADEMY — $68,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHEA FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY — $40,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAccademia Dell' Arte — $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetARKANSAS ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMUSEUM OF DISCOVERY — $17,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE
  • Who funds PULASKI ACADEMY
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THEA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY
  • Who funds EASTERSEALS ARKANSAS
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
  • Who funds Accademia Dell' Arte
  • Who funds ARKANSAS ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY
  • Who funds ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Brown Foundation · C Louis and Mary C Cabe Foundation · Riggs Benevolent Fund · Arvest Foundation · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cindy and Chip Murphy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph