Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chris Tucker Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$250k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$429kHuman Services$119kEducation$116kInternational$90kHealth$67kCrime & Legal$40kRecreation & Sports$30kAnimals$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $210k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW LIFE TABERNACLE$25,000
ROOTER PLUS FRO LOUISE KELLEY$22,639
INT'L DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN$22,000
MOTHERLESS DAUGHTERS$20,000
MOREHOUSE COLLEGEGOLF SCHOLARSHIPS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
ADKINS IRREVOCABLE TRUST$20,000
JAMAICA PROJECT USA$10,800
PAINE COLLEGE$10,000
NORTH CENTRAL GA COGIC WOMEN'S$10,000
HOWARD WHITE CENTERCARDIAC AMYLOIDOSIS$10,000
MBENGA FOUNDATION$10,000
D TERRENCE FOSTER FOUNDATION$10,000
SLAM DUNK BOOSTER CLUB$6,500
MAIN STREET RENEWAL FOR RALPH LEWIS$5,769
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%United Healtcare Childrens Foundation: $5k → 11%WOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%SISTERS BY CHOICE: $3k → 14%Sisters By Choice: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OR
NV
OH
NJ
CA
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$507k · 12 repeat orgs$551k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
43

Total granted

$507k
$417k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+23%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Paine College
    2× · 2022–2024 · $23k · revenue +5%
  • SB
    SISTERS BY CHOICE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k · revenue +36%
  • WI
    WOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • NL
    New Lif Tabernacle Cogic
    one grant, 2018 · $55k
  • NL
    New Life Tabernale Church
    one grant, 2017 · $43k
  • NL
    New Life Tabernacle Church
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Will Smith Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Oprah Winfrey Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Renee Montgomery Foundation Inc

As a whole every initiative that the Foundation undertakes strives to promote love, positivity, and equality to all.

Youth Development
4
The Ga Foster Legacy Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Sha'nini George Foundation
Philanthropy
6
The Deangelo Williams Foundation
—
7
Jordan Nwora Foundation
Youth Development
8
The Miami Girls Foundation Inc
—
9
John Jordan Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Muggsy Bogues Family Foundation

To empower underserved youth and families to improve their quality of life through food security, access to education, and workforce development.

Human Services
11
Tyrese Maxey Foundation
Youth Development
12
The Jackson Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unitedhealthcare Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Mbenga Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW LIFE TABERNACLE: $289,000 · OtherNEW LIFE TABERNACLENew Lif Tabernacle Cogic: $55,000 · OtherNew Lif Tabernacle CogicNew Life Tabernale Church: $43,296 · OtherNew Life Tabernacle Church: $40,000 · OtherADKINS IRREVOCABLE TRUST: $40,000 · OtherINT'L DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN: $37,000 · Other+47 more: $429,252 · Other+47 moreRyan Gordy Foundation: $15,000 · HealthD Terrence Foster Foundation Inc: $15,000 · HealthGeorgia Transplant Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthGigis House Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesORLANDO SERVE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesSISTERS BY CHOICE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesPaine College: $22,500 · EducationBRIAN JORDAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationMBENGA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyREACH GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyFlat Rock Archive: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKOOL KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureOPERATION LUNCHBOX INC: $5,000 · Religion
Other$933,548Health$35,000Human Services$33,000Education$32,500Philanthropy$13,000Arts & Culture$6,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPaine College: $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Martin Luther King Jr Center For Nonviolent Social Change Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRyan Gordy Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetD Terrence Foster Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetBRIAN JORDAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMBENGA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetGigis House Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetORLANDO SERVE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGeorgia Transplant Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDMF Internationl Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSISTERS BY CHOICE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetOPERATION LUNCHBOX INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE WILFLO FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetFlat Rock Archive: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSTATUS HOME INC F/K/A JERUSALEM HOUSE INC: $4,950 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREACH GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Paine College ↗
  • Who funds The Martin Luther King Jr Center For Nonviolent Social Change Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ryan Gordy Foundation ↗
  • Who funds D Terrence Foster Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIAN JORDAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MBENGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Gigis House Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO SERVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundation IncGA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chris Tucker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chris Tucker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chris Tucker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph