Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charles Rowe Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Environment$272kEducation$210kHealth$100kInternational$53kHuman Services$43kFood & Nutrition$33kArts & Culture$26kCrime & Legal$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$436k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DURHAM ACADEMY$105,000
GIVEWELL$7,500
THE JED FOUNDATION$7,500
MICAH ECUMENICAL MINISTRY$5,000
FREDERICKSBURG FOOD BANK$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK$5,000
LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE$4,000
CENTRAL VA BATTLEFIELD TRUST$3,000
THURMAN BRISBEN HOMELESS$3,000
LEGAL AID WORKS$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
FRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE$2,000
YMCA OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE$2,000
SALVATION ARMY OF FREDERICKSBURG$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHARITYWATER: $3k → 17%CHARITYWATER: $3k → 17%CHARITYWATER: $3k → 17%LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $4k → 15%YMCA OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $2k → 14%YMCA OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $2k → 14%YMCA OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $2k → 14%YMCA OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $2k → 14%YMCA OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $1k → 14%YMCA OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $1k → 14%YMCA OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$582k · 18 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$582k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+121%
+354%

Still filing today

56%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DURHAM ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $210k · revenue +12%
  • TC
    THE CLEAR FUND
    7× · 2018–2024 · $53k · revenue +648%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $38k · revenue +671%

Funded once

  • DG
    DOWNTOWN GREENS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -89%
  • TRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +354%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenways for Nashville Inc

Greenways for nashville promotes, supports, and enhances a system of greenways and open space in nashville and davidson county.

Recreation & Sports
2
Tenngreen Land Conservancy

The organization's primary mission is conserving land where people and nature can thrive by creating green corridors linking existing public lands using conservation easments and outright purchase.

Recreation & Sports
3
Harpeth Conservancy

To restore and protect clean water and healthy ecosystems for rivers in tennessee by employing scientific expertise and collaborative relationships to develop, promote, and support broad community stewardship and action.

Environment
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
6
The Clearwater Conservancy of Central Pennsylvania Inc

To conserve and restore the natural resources through land conservation, water resources stewardship and environmental outreach across central pennsylvania.

Environment
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Conservation Trust for North Carolina

Ctnc conserves land in ways that inspire and enable people to build resilient, just communities. we carry out our mission in collaboration with other conservation organizations and the communities we serve. our goal is to lessen the…

Environment
9
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
10
Forward Tn

Forwardtn is a non-profit project dedicated to elevating voices of forward-thinking tennesseans who want a balanced approach to government where policy affecting the wellbeing of people's lives is shaped by evidence and results, instead of…

Community Improvement
11
North Carolina Conservation Network

The north carolina conservation network supports, trains, and coordinates diverse groups and directly advocates to achieve equitable and sustainable solutions for our environment.

Environment
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Conflict Resolution Ctr; the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOWNTOWN GREENS INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentDOWNTOWN GREENS INCTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INCFRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE: $37,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKEFRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $34,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCKDURHAM ACADEMY INC: $210,000 · EducationDURHAM ACADEMY INCFREDERICKSBURG FOOD BANK: $33,000 · OtherFREDERICKSBURG FOOD BANKMICAH ECUMENICAL MINISTRY: $27,500 · OtherMICAH ECUMENICAL MINISTRYCENTRAL VA BATTLEFIELD TRUST: $26,000 · OtherCENTRAL VA BATTLEFIELD TRUS…LEGAL AID WORKS: $21,000 · OtherLEGAL AID WORKSTHURMAN BRISBEN HOMELESS: $20,000 · OtherTHURMAN BRISBEN HOMELESSHOPE HOUSE: $19,500 · OtherHOPE HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY OF FREDERICKSBURG: $14,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF FREDERICK…YWCA NASHVILLE & MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $9,000 · Other+1 more: $4,000 · OtherTHE CLEAR FUND: $52,500 · PhilanthropyTHE JED FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthYoung Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273): $11,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesLOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $4,000 · Human ServicesNASHVILLE CONFLICT RESOLUTION CTR: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Environment$271,500Education$210,000Other$188,000Philanthropy$52,500Health$35,000Human Services$24,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDURHAM ACADEMY INC: $210,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN GREENS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $52,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE: $37,500 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $34,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLEGAL AID WORKS: $21,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273): $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA NASHVILLE & MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE CONFLICT RESOLUTION CTR: $5,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DURHAM ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN GREENS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE ↗
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID WORKS ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273) ↗
  • Who funds YWCA NASHVILLE & MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE CONFLICT RESOLUTION CTR ↗
  • Who funds LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Rappahannock River Region IncVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Rappahannock River Region Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charles Rowe Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles Rowe Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Charles Rowe Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Charles Rowe Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles Rowe Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph