· Private foundation
The Charles Lamar Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $652k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $866k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAT HAVEN | $200,000 |
| COMPANION ANIMAL ALLIANCE | $156,250 |
| BATON ROUGE YOUTH COALITION | $100,000 |
| KNOCK KNOCK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $100,000 |
| GREAT HEARTS HARVESTON | $100,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA GREATER BATON ROUGE | $60,000 |
| BISSEL PET FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| FATHERS ON A MISSION | $50,000 |
| CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER | $50,000 |
| LOUISIANA ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES | $47,781 |
| FRIENDS OF THE SHELTER INC | $40,000 |
| THE LIFE OF A SINGLE MOM | $40,000 |
| LINE 4 LINE | $30,000 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY OF LOUISIANA | $30,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S SERVICES OF THE CAPITAL AREA | $29,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $267k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of The Charles Lamar Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in LA; read by stated purpose it is 86% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $480k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BRBaton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc6× · 2019–2024 · $643k · revenue +156%
- LKLOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY6× · 2019–2024 · $460k · revenue +189%
- CACOMPANION ANIMAL ALLIANCE6× · 2019–2024 · $456k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- FYFRONT YARD BIKESone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -23% · 34% of their budget
- TWTHE WATER INSTITUTE OF THE GULFgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $120k · revenue +39%
- BRBATON ROUGE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INCone grant, 2022 · $80k · revenue -32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.
To provide sound analysis of state fiscal issues to promote economic prosperity, a rising standard of living, and the opportunity for all citizens to reach their highest potential.
The mission of the new orleans museum of art is to inspire the love of art; to collect, preserve, exhibit and present excellence in the visual arts; to educate, challenge and engage a diverse public.
Provides quality training for early education providers
To transform Southwest Louisianas economy from one that extracts from our community to one that nourishes us.
To promote architecture.
To provide high quality comprehensive health care services for the under-served population of east baton rouge parish and the surrounding areas regardless of ability to pay.
To provide children in Southwest Louisiana facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.
Pregnancy counseling
Using direct representation and advocacy, we fight to keep children out of the justice system so that they can thrive in their homes and communities.
Louisiana appleseed solves our state's toughest problems at their root cause by advocating for access to justice, opportunity, and education. we believe that our state will be stronger through fair and equitable access to the courts, the…
To offer prevention, intervention and postvention services that provide support in times of crisis and reduce the impact of suicide, homicide and violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Louisiana Endowment for the Humanities and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Baton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COMPANION ANIMAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NEW SCHOOLS FOR BATON ROUGE ↗
- Who funds FRONT YARD BIKES ↗
- Who funds CAT HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES ↗
- Who funds THE EMERGE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S SERVICES OF THE CAPITAL AREA ↗
- Who funds Arts Council of Greater Baton Rouge Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LIFE OF A SINGLE MOM ↗
- Who funds KNOCK KNOCK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA ART & SCIENCE MUSEUMINC ↗
- Who funds THE WATER INSTITUTE OF THE GULF ↗
- Who funds BALDWIN FAMILY VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LINE 4 LINE ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Nola Nature School Corporation ↗
- Who funds Empower Mali ↗
- Who funds MANNERS OF THE HEART INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Animals BR Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WALLS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Friends of Turkana Inc CO MR JAMES LAUGHLIN ↗
- Who funds FOAM Fathers on a Mission ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Louisiana Inc ↗
- Who funds BISSELL Pet Foundation ↗
- Who funds THREE SPRINGS COMMUNITY FARM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DOUGLAS MANSHIP SR THEATRE COMPLEX HOLDING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Huey & Angelina Wilson Foundation · Baton Rouge Area Foundation · The Credit Bureau of Baton Rouge Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · The Merice Boo Johnston Grigsby Foundation · Capital Area United Way · Irene W & Cb Pennington Private Foundation · Pennington Family Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Rotary Club of Baton Rouge Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Foundation for Louisiana
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Charles Lamar Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Charles Lamar Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Charles Lamar Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.