Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charles A Becker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$381kCivil Rights$125kYouth Development$124kEducation$118kHuman Services$93kEnvironment$70kHealth$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$4,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Heal LA Foundation$10,519
Cal Poly Arts$7,948
San Francisco Conservatory of Music$7,100
Sojourn To the Past$4,300
Hearst Castle Foundation$2,455
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Los Angeles Conservancy$52
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Onesight: $1k → 6%Boldly Me: $10k → 10%Boldly Me: $5k → 10%Tides: $325 → 10%YMCA of San Francisco: $50k → 10%YMCA of San Francisco: $23k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OR
OH
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$969k · 21 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
23

Total granted

$969k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+32%

Still filing today

48%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SOJOURN TO THE PAST
    6× · 2017–2025 · $163k · revenue ×14
  • VO
    VOICE OF WITNESS A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $125k · revenue +1%
  • 1
    100cameras
    4× · 2019–2022 · $124k · revenue +74% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • SR
    SLIDE RANCH
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -41%
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF THE MADELEINE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AT
    Art To Change The World Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +113%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
2
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
3
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

—
5
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
6
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
7
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
8
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
9
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
10
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
11
San Diego Society of Natural History

Conserving nature through science and discovery.

Arts & Culture
12
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Zoological Society; the most unlike its peers is Art to Change the World Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $78,853 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOcean Shore School PTO: $64,250 · OtherOcean Shore School PTONetarts Bay Watershed: $40,000 · OtherNetarts Bay WatershedSan Jose State University: $34,010 · OtherSan Jose State UniversityCal Poly Arts: $18,170 · OtherCal Poly ArtsKnox College Eckford Scholarship: $17,606 · OtherKnox College Eckford ScholarshipHeal LA Foundation: $16,519 · Other+21 more: $47,010 · Other+21 moreSOJOURN TO THE PAST: $163,256 · Arts & CultureSOJOURN TO THE PASTArt To Change The World Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureArt To Change The W…+6 more: $6,300 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $177,600 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO CONSE…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationVOICE OF WITNESS A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $125,102 · Civil RightsVOICE OF WITN…100cameras: $124,474 · Youth Development100camerasYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $72,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN…BOLDLY ME: $15,000 · Human ServicesBOLDLY ME+2 more: $1,325 · Human ServicesSLIDE RANCH: $25,350 · Environment
Other$316,418Arts & Culture$179,556Education$178,600Civil Rights$125,102Youth Development$124,474Human Services$88,825Environment$25,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $177,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSOJOURN TO THE PAST: $163,256 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetVOICE OF WITNESS A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $125,102 over 5y, 6.3% of budget100cameras: $124,474 over 4y, 30% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $72,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSLIDE RANCH: $25,350 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT TRAINING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION: $3,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $1,440 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOneSight: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth in Arts: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL COAST STATE PARKS ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $358 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES INC: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $269 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURN TO THE PAST ↗
  • Who funds VOICE OF WITNESS A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds 100cameras ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds SLIDE RANCH ↗
  • Who funds BOLDLY ME ↗
  • Who funds Art To Change The World Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT TRAINING ↗
  • Who funds ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds OneSight ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS ↗
  • Who funds Youth in Arts ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COAST STATE PARKS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
  • Who funds TIDES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charles A Becker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles A Becker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Charles A Becker Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Charles A Becker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles A Becker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph