Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chang Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$96k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$262kHealth$159kEducation$77kHuman Services$56kInternational$45kCommunity Improvement$28kCrime & Legal$13kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,300
Median grant
12
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF MICHIGAN$50,000
KOREAN CHURCH OF ANN ARBOR$10,300
K-LIFE STORY$7,000
NEW LIFE KOREAN CHURCH$5,200
NAVIGATOR$3,000
URBAN IMPACT$3,000
INTER VARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$3,000
MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN STUDY$3,000
KOREAN AMER ASSOC OF LAGUNA WOODS$2,300
TURNING POINT BIBLE MISSION$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
ST JUDE$1,000
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$1,000
PARALYZED VETS OF AMERICA$1,000
HUNGARIAN COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$702k · 51 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
27

Total granted

$702k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+4%

Still filing today

31%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    9× · 2017–2025 · $177k · revenue +202%
  • GO
    GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +62%
  • FP
    FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $11k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • OD
    One Days Wages
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -35%
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +24%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
4
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
5
World Christian Broadcasting Corporation

World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.

Arts & Culture
6
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
7
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
8
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
9
Visionsynergy

Our mission is to accelerate the great commission by equipping leaders, developing networks, and catalyzing collaboration toward spiritual breakthroughs among the least reached peoples and places of the world.

International
10
Medical Teams International

Medical teams international is a christian humanitarian relief agency focused on providing life-saving medical care for people in crisis.

International
11
Christian Veterinary Mission

Christian veterinary mission (cvm) serves to challenge, empower and facilitate veterinary professionals to serve others, living out their christian faith through long term missions, short term missions, professional ministry, affiliate…

Animals
12
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Back to the Bible; the most unlike its peers is Korean School of Ann Arbor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $176,500 · OtherUniversity of MichiganKOREAN CHURCH: $155,950 · OtherKOREAN CHURCHKINGS SCHOOL: $26,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherFOCUS ON FAMILY: $21,000 · Other+51 more: $176,150 · Other+51 moreBACK TO THE BIBLE: $36,000 · ReligionBACK TO THE …CRISTA Ministries: $15,000 · ReligionCRISTA Minis…THE KOREAN CHURCH OF ANN ARBOR: $10,300 · ReligionTHE KOREAN C…AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $8,000 · ReligionAMERICAN BIB…IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · ReligionIN TOUCH MIN…InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $5,000 · ReligionInterVarsity…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S …+1 more: $500 · ReligionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,500 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $6,000 · InternationalOne Days Wages: $5,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $5,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR EWHA WOMANS UNIVERSITY INC: $3,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalFRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL: $11,000 · EducationKOREAN SCHOOL OF ANN ARBOR: $9,700 · EducationMichigan Christian Study Center: $8,000 · Education+3 more: $1,300 · EducationCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,500 · Human ServicesSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE FOUNDATION OF LAGUNA WOODS VILLAGE: $1,000 · Human ServicesGIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · HealthTHE SHEPHERDS DOOR: $500 · Youth Development
Other$578,100Religion$84,800International$33,500Education$30,000Human Services$24,200Health$15,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $176,500 over 9y, 10% of budgetBACK TO THE BIBLE: $36,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKOREAN SCHOOL OF ANN ARBOR: $9,700 over 2y, 15% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Christian Study Center: $8,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOne Days Wages: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR EWHA WOMANS UNIVERSITY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF LAGUNA WOODS VILLAGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS WESTERN GOLF FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHEPHERDS DOOR: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHURON MUSIC ASSOCIATION: $300 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds BACK TO THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds CRISTA Ministries ↗
  • Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE KOREAN CHURCH OF ANN ARBOR ↗
  • Who funds CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN SCHOOL OF ANN ARBOR ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Christian Study Center ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds One Days Wages ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY12.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Servant Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chang Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chang Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chang Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph