· Private foundation
The Chandler Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EBENEZER BRAZILIAN CHURCH | $120,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $45,000 |
| PEACHTREE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $20,000 |
| GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| MAGICAL MOMENTS | $20,000 |
| MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER | $10,000 |
| REFLECTIONS MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| HINRI | $4,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| BUCKHEAD CHURCH | $2,000 |
| HIGHLANDS HEALTH FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| CRU MINISTRIES | $2,000 |
| CAMP TWIN LAKES | $2,000 |
| GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL | $1,000 |
| ST PIUS X CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
34 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +116%- EUEmory University2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +16%
- GWGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC4× · 2018–2021 · $10k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- M2Matthew 25 Ministries Incone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -6%
- RCREFORMED CHURCH OF AMERICAone grant, 2023 · $35k
- MMMAGIC MOMENTSone grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…
To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…
To provide high-value preclinical testing and training services to medical device, biologics, and pharmaceutical developers and manufacturers.
Gwinnett medical group, inc., (gmgi),was formed for the purpose of establishing and operating certain hospital based and clinical outreach physician services with our service community. gmgi employs specialty physicians that serve patients…
The georgia tech research corporation (gtrc) is organized and operated to support the research activities of the georgia institute of technology in the areas of innovative research, technical assistance, and economic development.
The mission of the grady health foundation is to grow both philanthropic support and broad-based understanding of the critical role that grady health system plays in the metro atlanta region. our focus is to ensure grady health system has…
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…
Our mission is to deliver a lifetime of quality and compassionate care for each patient we serve.
How this is measured
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds REFLECTIONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds MAGIC MOMENTS ↗
- Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HINRI ↗
- Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOBBY DODD INSTITUTE INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Chandler Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chandler Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Chandler Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Chandler Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Chandler’s filings →