Skip to content
The Center for Community Solutions at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Center for Community Solutions

THE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS provides various support services to individuals and organizations throughout northeast ohio.

$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.3MCivil Rights$459kCrime & Legal$436kPublic Benefit$318kHuman Services$208kArts & Culture$94kYouth Development$60kEmployment$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $15,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $50,940 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,940 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL$5,000
THE OHIO POVERTY LAW CENTER$5,000
THE CITY CLUB OF CLEVELAND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $291k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VINCENTIAN OHIO ACTION NETWORK: $10k → 15%NUEVA LUZ URBAN RESOURCE CENTER: $40k → 17%Nueva Luz Urban Resource Center: $20k → 17%NUEVA LUZ URBAN RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 17%NUEVA LUZ URBAN RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 17%NUEVA LUZ URBAN RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 17%BRENDA GLASS MULTIPURPOSE TRAUMA: $15k → 17%Centers for Families and Children: $27k → 17%CARE ALLIANCE HEALTH CENTER: $59k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $25k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $25k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $13k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $13k → 17%GINN FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 23 repeat orgs$658k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
30

Total granted

$2.4M
$653k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+42%

Still filing today

91%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Circle Health Services
    6× · 2017–2023 · $400k · revenue +617%
  • LG
    LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $269k · revenue +186%
  • TM
    THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $165k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue +65%
  • FI
    FAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $65k · revenue -66%
  • FI
    FAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE
    one grant, 2020 · $65k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Aids NetworkAkron Pride Initi

The organization's mission is to prevent further transmission of HIV through education and risk reduction efforts and to provide housing assistance and other supportive services to people already affected by HIV.

Human Services
2
Cleveland Jobs With Justice

To work as a coalition of labor unions, community organzation, and religious community to raise the public awarness of and build campaigns to promote workers rights an social justice issues.

Education
3
Lead Ohio

At lead ohio our goal is to make a difference in communities across ohio by recruiting, training, supporting and empowering progressive leaders in all regions of the state.

Education
4
Ohio Womens Alliance

The Ohio Womens Alliance is a statewide membership of grassroots leaders, organizers, community builders and activists creating a better Ohio for all through a reproductive justice lens.

Community Improvement
5
Justice League

The mission of Ohio Crime Victim Justice Center (OCVJC) is to ensure that the constitutional and statutory rights of Ohio crime victims are protected and enforced in state and federal jurisdictions in all 88 Ohio counties. To fulfill this…

Crime & Legal
6
Akron Aids Collaborative

The organization's primary purpose is to broaden the network of caring organizations in the community, to influence social norms that contribute to the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS and to increase advocacy for social services for…

Human Services
7
Cleveland Rape Crisis Center

The cleveland rape crisis center is a non-profit organization which supports survivors of sexual violence, promotes healing and prevention, and advocates for social change.

Health
8
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
9
Abortion Forward

Abortion forward is committed to developing and sustaining a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee every ohioan the right to make personal decisions regarding a full range of reproductive choices, including legal…

—
10
The Columbus Partnership

Economic development: investigation and study of various areas of need for the development of plans and programs to be undertaken and the creation of strategies and programming to begin executing the same.

Community Improvement
11
Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence

The ohio alliance to end sexual violence (oaesv) serves as ohio's statewide sexual assault coalition, advancing comprehensive responses to sexual violence through advocacy, prevention, and survivor-centered support. we equip and empower…

Health
12
The Cincinnati Health Network Inc

The cincnnati health network (chn) is a grantee for the health care for the homeless program in the greater cincinnati area and operates as a federally qualified health center. the chn is also the ryan white part c grantee and provides…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ohio Organizing Collaborative; the most unlike its peers is Healthcare Access Worldwide Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
33/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER: $300,000 · Civil RightsOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTE…LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $269,405 · Civil RightsLESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGEN…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIO…Equality Ohio Education Fund: $38,190 · Civil RightsOHIOANS TO STOP EXECUTIONS: $37,500 · Civil RightsASSEMBLY FOR THE ARTS: $30,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $5,000 · Civil RightsCircle Health Services: $400,000 · OtherCircle Health ServicesFAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE: $65,000 · OtherFAITH IN PUBLIC LIFENATIONAL NETWORK FOR JUSTICE: $42,500 · OtherFAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE INC: $65,000 · OtherFAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE INCPROJECT LIFT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $50,000 · OtherPROJECT LIFT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SER…TOWARDS EMPLOYMENT INC: $50,000 · OtherTOWARDS EMPLOYMENT INC+19 more: $256,548 · Other+19 moreURSULINE PIAZZA: $230,677 · HealthURSULINE PIAZZATHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 · HealthTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATI…UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $70,311 · HealthUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEA…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $50,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GR…PRETERM CLEVELAND INC: $50,000 · HealthPRETERM CLEVELAND INCMINISTRY OF HOPE: $40,000 · HealthMINISTRY OF HOPE+3 more: $47,678 · Health+3 moreNUEVA LUZ URBAN RESOURCE CENTER: $80,000 · Human ServicesNUEVA LUZ …UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY…CARE ALLIANCE: $59,022 · Human ServicesCARE ALLIA…The Centers for Families and Children: $27,245 · Human ServicesThe Center…GINN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesGINN FOUND…BRENDA GLASS MULTI PURPOSE CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesVINCENTIAN OHIO ACTION NETWORK: $10,000 · Human ServicesWe Think 4 a Change: $138,000 · Community ImprovementOHIO FAMILIES UNITE AGAINST POLICE BRUTALITY: $8,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CITY CLUB OF CLEVELAND: $112,381 · EducationGrassroots Power Project: $21,000 · EducationLEAD THE WAY LEARNING ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationOHIO VOICE: $68,500 · Public BenefitTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Civil Rights$780,095Other$929,048Health$653,666Human Services$291,267Community Improvement$146,000Education$143,381Public Benefit$78,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCircle Health Services: $400,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER: $300,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetLESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $269,405 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetURSULINE PIAZZA: $230,677 over 7y, 28% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWe Think 4 a Change: $138,000 over 4y, 52% of budgetTHE CITY CLUB OF CLEVELAND: $112,381 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNUEVA LUZ URBAN RESOURCE CENTER: $80,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $70,311 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO VOICE: $68,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE INC: $65,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCARE ALLIANCE: $59,022 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRETERM CLEVELAND INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTOWARDS EMPLOYMENT INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT LIFT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $50,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK FOR JUSTICE: $42,500 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetMINISTRY OF HOPE: $40,000 over 2y, 95% of budgetEquality Ohio Education Fund: $38,190 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetOHIOANS TO STOP EXECUTIONS: $37,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetASSEMBLY FOR THE ARTS: $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Centers for Families and Children: $27,245 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGINN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetCLEVELAND FILM SOCIETY: $24,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPOLICY MATTERS OHIO: $23,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGrassroots Power Project: $21,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHRIVE FOR CHANGE: $20,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetAMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRENDA GLASS MULTI PURPOSE CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetART OPPORTUNITIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEquitas Health Inc: $12,012 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPLEWOOD CENTERS INC: $10,370 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEAD THE WAY LEARNING ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVINCENTIAN OHIO ACTION NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORIANA HOUSE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAROON ARTS GROUP: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…The George Gund Found…Greater Cleveland Nei…Ohio VoiceThe Char and Chuck Fo…Jewish Federation of …Women's Fund of Centr…Higley Fund of the Cl…Mt Sinai Health Care …NEO Philanthropy IncNew Venture FundSaint Lukes Foundatio…
The Cleveland FoundationOH41.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers · Ohio Voice · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Women's Fund of Central Ohio · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Center for Community Solutions funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Center for Community Solutions. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Center for Community Solutions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home