· Public charity
Ohio Voice
Our mission is to support and grow the ecosystem of non-profit, non-partisan organizations doing year-round civic engagement with underrepresented communities in order to improve people's lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k15 grants · $387k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FREEDOM RIGHTEOUS ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE | $225,001 |
| HONESTY FOR OHIO EDUCATION | $200,000 |
| OHIO COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION | $158,332 |
| OHIO FAMILIES UNITE AGAINST POLICE BRUTALITY | $155,000 |
| NORTHEAST OHIO WORKER CENTER | $131,464 |
| GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC | $100,000 |
| OHIO WOMENS ALLIANCE | $96,135 |
| GREATER CLEVELAND NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS ASSOCIATION | $91,000 |
| YOUNG LATINO NETWORK | $67,166 |
| OHIO UNITY | $66,667 |
| COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND | $60,000 |
| GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC | $50,000 |
| FAIR ELECTIONS CENTER | $48,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION OF OHIO | $40,000 |
| CRAZY FAITH MINISTRIES | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +105% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $783k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FRFREEDOM RIGHTEOUS ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE3× · 2022–2024 · $510k · revenue +102% · 28% of their budget
- OWOhio Womens Alliance4× · 2020–2024 · $390k · revenue +301% · 26% of their budget
- OCOHIO CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND4× · 2020–2024 · $252k · revenue +104%
Funded once
- RVRIVER VALLEY ORGANIZINGone grant, 2022 · $88k
- OPOHIO PEOPLE'S JUSTICE LEADERSone grant, 2022 · $85k
- EOEquality Ohioone grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue +13% · 49% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Local ballot issue committee
The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.
Research organization focuses on eliminating and preventing gerrymandering in the State of Ohio.
To convene a high capacity group of donors that strategically leverage resources to achieve political and policy goals advancing the progressive movement in Ohio by strengthening infrastructure.
The purpose of the Ohio Womens Alliance Action Fund is to build capacity for women, femmes, and gender-expansive folksparticularly Black womento determine the lives they want for themselves, their families, and their communities through…
To work as a coalition of labor unions, community organzation, and religious community to raise the public awarness of and build campaigns to promote workers rights an social justice issues.
At lead ohio our goal is to make a difference in communities across ohio by recruiting, training, supporting and empowering progressive leaders in all regions of the state.
Ohio immigrant alliance is a group of ohio immigrants and citizens working together to protect the dignity and rights of all individuals who choose to make ohio their homeregardless of race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity…
Aclu of ohio foundation leverages advocacy, litigation, and public education to champion fairness, freedom and justice for all as guaranteed under the constitution and the laws of the u.s.
Statewide ballot issue committee
The mission of Avanzamos Unidos is to grow Latine political power in the state of Ohio. We are building a multi-class, multi-generational grassroots community organization that harnesses the collective political power of the Latinx/a/o/e…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Citizen Action and the most unlike its peers is River Valley Organizing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FREEDOM RIGHTEOUS ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds Ohio Womens Alliance ↗
- Who funds OHIO CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds COMMON CAUSE ↗
- Who funds OHIO FAMILIES UNITE AGAINST POLICE BRUTALITY ↗
- Who funds HONESTY FOR OHIO EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OHIO ↗
- Who funds Young Latino Network ↗
- Who funds OHIO COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION ↗
- Who funds PROMISE OF DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO WORKER CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO VOTER ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers ↗
- Who funds RIVER VALLEY ORGANIZING ↗
- Who funds Fair Elections Center ↗
- Who funds Equality Ohio ↗
- Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OHIO EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO ↗
- Who funds URGE UNITE FOR REPRODUCTIVE & GENDER EQUITY ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION OF OHIO ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS-OH ↗
- Who funds Black Appalachian Coalition ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION ↗
- Who funds OHIO CITIZEN ACTION ↗
- Who funds SHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds Abortion Fund of Ohio ↗
- Who funds THINK MAKE LIVE YOUTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The George Gund Foundation · Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · Columbus Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Women's Fund of Central Ohio · Clean and Prosperous America · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Ohio Progressive Collaborative Education Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ohio Voice funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.