· Private foundation
The Cecily & David Murphy Majerus Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $100k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Environmental Resource Center | $15,000 |
| Resurrection Project | $10,000 |
| Ocean Conservancy | $10,000 |
| Neighboorhood Villages | $7,500 |
| Ellis Early Learning | $7,500 |
| New Directions | $7,000 |
| Everytown for Gun Safety | $7,000 |
| Community Help in Park Slope | $6,000 |
| N Street Village | $5,000 |
| Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition | $5,000 |
| Brennan Center | $5,000 |
| Friendship Place | $5,000 |
| National Immigration Law Center | $5,000 |
| High Mighty Therapeutic Riding | $4,667 |
| Camp Friendship | $4,667 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.
27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- NDNEW DIRECTIONS INC8× · 2018–2025 · $59k · revenue +58%
- FPFriendship Place8× · 2018–2025 · $53k · revenue +120%
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC7× · 2019–2025 · $53k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- CCCARLETON COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +26%
- LILutheran Immigration Refuge Serone grant, 2021 · $10k
BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +54%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…
To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…
U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…
Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.
How this is measured
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Friendship Place ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
- Who funds STRIDES FOR PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION ↗
- Who funds CAMP FRIENDSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST KID'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Transformca dba Transform ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Farm to Pantry ↗
- Who funds High & Mighty Therapeutic Riding ↗
- Who funds THE WASSAIC PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition ↗
- Who funds BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD VILLAGES INC ↗
- Who funds ELLIS EARLY LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
- Who funds FUND TEXAS CHOICE ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN-WOOD CEMETERY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC ↗
- Who funds N STREET VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Annenberg Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Cecily & David Murphy Majerus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cecily & David Murphy Majerus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge: 100% of income from government
- Neighborhood Villages Inc: 33% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
- Ellis Early Learning Inc: 20% of income from government
- Gulf Coast Kid's House Inc: 16% of income from government
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc: 8% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Cecily & David Murphy Majerus Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Cecily & David Murphy Majerus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Cecily & David Murphy Majerus’ filings →