Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Catalyst Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.5MEducation$1.0MCommunity Improvement$230kYouth Development$150kArts & Culture$10kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$700,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILBRAHAM & MONSON ACADEMY$700,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $25k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Orleans Police and Justice Foundation Inc

Support of the new orleans police department and orleans parish criminal justice system along with crime prevention activities with the public. nopjf helps the nopd initiate innovative programs that make new orleans a safer place to live,…

Crime & Legal
2
Greater New Orleans Inc

To spearhead economic development for the ten parish greater new orleans region by creating a favorable business environment that fosters economic growth.

—
3
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
4
The Louisville Urban League Inc

As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.

Human Services
5
Invest in Louisiana

To provide sound analysis of state fiscal issues to promote economic prosperity, a rising standard of living, and the opportunity for all citizens to reach their highest potential.

Public Benefit
6
Nola Business Alliance

Charged by the city of new orleans with leading the economic recovery and development of orleans parish. the organization's focus is to grow the job base and secure private investment for orleans parish by attracting corporations for…

Community Improvement
7
Renew - Reinventing Education

The renew charter management organization will transform underperforming schools into academically rigorous schools that prepare students for the next level of achievement, including high school, college, and career.

Education
8
Goodwill Industries of North La Inc

Enhance the dignity and quality of life for individuals, families, and communities by eliminating barriers to opportunity and helping people in need reach their fullest potential through employment and workforce development…

Employment
9
University of New Orleans Research and Technology Foundation Inc

-To support any and all programs, facilities, research, and educational opportunities offered by the University of New Orleans and the University of Louisiana System.-To encourage teaching, research, scholarship, and services, and increase…

Health
10
North Louisiana Economic Partnership Inc

Economic development activities for north louisiana. the north louisiana economic partnership works to ensure that companies identify north louisiana as a desirable business location and encourages capital investment and job creation by…

Community Improvement
11
Inspirenola Charter Schools

To inspire an educational movement where students can develop academic and personal skills in order to be prepared for college, their community and the world.

Education
12
Miami-Dade Innovation Authority Inc

Miami-dade innovation authority bridges the gap between private innovators and the public sector to fast track innovation that improves quality of life for miamians.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Orleans Startup Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kickin Parkinsons Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,477,776 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCWILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMY: $875,000 · OtherWILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADE…+1 more: $25,000 · OtherISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $150,000 · EducationYOUTHFORCE NOLA: $150,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationGREATER NEW ORLEANS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Community ImprovementNEW ORLEANS STARTUP FUND INC: $80,000 · Community ImprovementURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $25,000 · Human ServicesLOUISIANA CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,477,776Other$900,000Education$302,500Community Improvement$205,000Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,477,776 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMY: $875,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUTHFORCE NOLA: $150,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGREATER NEW ORLEANS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetNEW ORLEANS STARTUP FUND INC: $80,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOUISIANA CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKICKIN PARKINSONS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baptist Community MinistriesLA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baptist Community Ministries · Woldenberg Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Catalyst Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Catalyst Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Wilbraham and Monson Academy: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Catalyst’s filings →

More from the funding graph