Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cartwright Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$172kRecreation & Sports$104kYouth Development$78kReligion$41kHuman Services$31kArts & Culture$23kHealth$22kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAURICE MATHYS LITTLE LEAGUE$65,000
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$40,000
LA CASA DE AMISTAD$10,000
REINS FOR LIFE$10,000
PORTAGE TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRYTRUSTE$5,000
FRIENDS OF GRANGER PATHS INC$5,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL 4263$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REAL SERVICES: $500 → 13%REAL SERVICES: $400 → 13%REAL SERVICES: $350 → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $24k → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $21k → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $13k → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $10k → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
MA
IN
NE
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of The Cartwright Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 83%.

The Cartwright Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$457k · 18 repeat orgs$219k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
40

Total granted

$457k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+26%

Still filing today

39%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $73k · revenue +46%
  • RO
    REINS OF LIFE INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +92%
  • LC
    LA CASA DE AMISTAD INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +829%

Funded once

  • CW
    CHET WAGGONER LITTLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
3
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
4
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Arc of Wabash County Inc

The mission of arc of wabash county, inc. is to challenge, empower, and support individuals with disabilities to reach their highest level of independence. arc of wabash is dedicated to: 1) preserve, protect, and promote the dignity of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of St Joseph County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Granger Paths Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANDERON AGOSTINO AND KELLER: $164,000 · OtherANDERON AGOSTINO AND KELLERMAURICE MATHYS LITTLE LEAGUE: $65,000 · OtherMAURICE MATHYS LITTLE LEAGUEKROC CORPS SALVATION ARMY: $23,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF NORTHERN INDIANA: $18,000 · OtherREINS OF LIFE INC: $17,600 · Other+45 more: $177,870 · Other+45 moreHARRIS BASEBALL SOFTBALL INC: $81,000 · Recreation & SportsHARRIS BASEBA…YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $73,250 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVIC…+1 more: $1,250 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $40,000 · HealthTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthALCOHOL & ADDICTIONS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthFRIENDS OF GRANGER PATHS INC: $5,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,500 · EducationIndiana University Foundation: $750 · EducationYELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART: $1,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$465,470Recreation & Sports$81,000Human Services$74,500Health$45,000Education$8,250Arts & Culture$3,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARRIS BASEBALL SOFTBALL INC: $81,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $73,250 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHARVARD GLEE GLUB ALUMNI INC: $14,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALCOHOL & ADDICTIONS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARRIS BASEBALL SOFTBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds REINS OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD GLEE GLUB ALUMNI INC ↗
  • Who funds LA CASA DE AMISTAD INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds MISHAWAKA LIONS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GRANGER PATHS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds ALCOHOL & ADDICTIONS RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of St Joseph County IncIN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Vera Z Dwyer Charitable Trust Uad 121920 · Asante Foundation Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Bowsher the Booher Foundation · Radiology Inc Foundation · Memorial Hospital of South Bend Inc · Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cartwright Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cartwright Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Cartwright Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Cartwright Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cartwright’s filings →

    More from the funding graph