Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Memorial Hospital of South Bend Inc

We deliver outstanding care, inspire health and connect with heart.

$552k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$7.0MPhilanthropy$513kCommunity Improvement$401kYouth Development$329kHuman Services$249kEducation$236kEnvironment$151kHousing & Shelter$87kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22 grants below total $397,611 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $551,678 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $154,067 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $353k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$678M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Oaklawn Psychiatric Center Inc$40,000
Transformation Ministries Inc$34,000
Imani Unidad Inc$30,000
Cultivating Life Inc$30,000
Lacasa de Amistad Inc$25,000
LGBTQ Resource Center$25,000
Gentlemen and Scholars Inc$25,000
Play Like A Champion Today Ed Services$25,000
United Way of St Joseph County IN$20,000
Downtown South Bend Inc$20,000
Mental Health Awareness of Michiana$20,000
IYSA Indiana Youth Services Association$18,000
YMCA of Greater Michiana$15,784
United Health Services$12,800
Indiana University Foundation IUSM-SB$12,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%IYSA Indiana Youth Services Association: $18k → 16%Cultivating Life Inc: $30k → 13%LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 13%LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 13%LGBTQ Resource Center: $25k → 13%LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 13%UPPER ROOM RECOVERY COMMUNITY: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.9M · 29 repeat orgs$293k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
12

Total granted

$8.9M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-15%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    Beacon Medical Group Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $6.3M · revenue +75%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $463k · revenue +4%
  • VP
    VENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $176k · revenue +452%

Funded once

  • CU
    CROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -15%
  • BU
    BETHEL UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +0%
  • TP
    THE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

6
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
10
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
11
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
12
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Youth Services Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Michiana Vegfest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Education & Aware…Youth Development and Commu…Hospital Systems & Health F…Community Health & Support …Youth & Recreational Sports…Christian Missionary Outrea…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr17%20%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr20%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr17%5%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr13%77%35–55yr20%10%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
13%
190/1,452

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
30/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Beacon Medical Group Inc — $6,318,022 · HealthBeacon Medical Group Inc+5 more — $397,500 · Health+5 moreDOWNTOWN SOUTH BEND INC — $100,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN SOU…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MICHIANA INC — $90,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S …CANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES — $85,000 · OtherCANCER SOCIE…THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $76,500 · OtherTHE CENTER F…YWCA NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $73,258 · OtherYWCA NORTH C…LA CASA DE AMISTAD INC — $58,000 · OtherLA CASA DE A…CROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC — $50,000 · OtherUNITED HEALTH SERVICES OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY — $48,400 · OtherSt Joseph County — $34,250 · OtherTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC — $102,000 · OtherTRANSFORMATI…PLAY LIKE A CHAMPION TODAY EDUCATIONAL SERIES INC — $97,500 · OtherPLAY LIKE A …Unity Gardens — $55,950 · OtherUnity Garden…+10 more — $147,204 · Other+10 moreUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $462,500 · PhilanthropyTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTER FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC — $48,000 · PhilanthropyIndiana University Foundation — $107,500 · EducationGENTLEMEN & SCHOLARS INC — $101,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $37,490 · EducationBETHEL UNIVERSITY INC — $35,000 · EducationTHE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · EducationELKHART EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Education+2 more — $17,000 · EducationNORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION ORGANIZATION INC — $150,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 · Community ImprovementENFOCUS INC — $30,000 · Community ImprovementVENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION — $175,750 · EnvironmentTHE LGBTQ CENTER INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesCULTIVATING LIFE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesINDIANA YOUTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC — $18,000 · Human ServicesREAL SERVICES INC — $12,149 · Human ServicesUPPER ROOM RECOVERY COMMUNITY INC — $10,000 · Human Services
Health$6,715,522Other$1,018,062Philanthropy$510,500Education$347,990Community Improvement$270,000Environment$175,750Human Services$160,149

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBeacon Medical Group Inc — $6,318,022 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $462,500 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetVENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION — $175,750 over 6y, 15% of budgetNORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION ORGANIZATION INC — $150,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetOAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC — $140,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIMANI AND UNIDAD — $130,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetMental Health Awareness of Michiana Inc — $109,000 over 5y, 52% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $107,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC — $102,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetGENTLEMEN & SCHOLARS INC — $101,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetDOWNTOWN SOUTH BEND INC — $100,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetPLAY LIKE A CHAMPION TODAY EDUCATIONAL SERIES INC — $97,500 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MICHIANA INC — $90,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LGBTQ CENTER INC — $90,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetCANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES — $85,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $76,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetYWCA NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $73,258 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC — $58,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUnity Gardens — $55,950 over 3y, 14% of budgetCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetUNITED HEALTH SERVICES OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY — $48,400 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTER FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC — $48,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $37,490 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEAR NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD INC — $30,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetENFOCUS INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCULTIVATING LIFE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMICHIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION — $22,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetELKHART EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetINDIANA YOUTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL GOODWILL INDUSTRIES — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MICHIANA INC — $15,784 over 1y, 0.1% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER SOUTH BEND — $15,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetREINS OF LIFE INC — $12,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC — $12,149 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIANA VEGFEST INC — $11,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetUPPER ROOM RECOVERY COMMUNITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SOUTHERN LAKE MICHIGAN REGION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTANLEY CLARK SCHOOL INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLogan Community Resources Inc — $5,170 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of St Joseph County IncIN53.7× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of St Joseph County Inc · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua · Asante Foundation Inc · Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center- South Bend Campus Inc · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · American Electric Power Foundation · Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Memorial Hospital of South Bend Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph