Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cartwright Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Community Improvement$172kRecreation & Sports$104kYouth Development$78kReligion$41kHuman Services$31kArts & Culture$23kHealth$22kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARRIS BASEBALLSOFTBALL$30,000
KROC CORPS SALVATION ARMY$15,000
CHET WAGGONER LITTLE LEAGUE$10,000
YMCA$5,000
EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF NORTHERN IND$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REAL SERVICES: $500 → 13%REAL SERVICES: $400 → 13%REAL SERVICES: $350 → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $24k → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $21k → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $13k → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $10k → 13%YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
NY
MA
IN
NE
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of The Cartwright Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in IN; read by stated purpose it is 83% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Cartwright Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$433k · 17 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
39

Total granted

$433k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+26%

Still filing today

41%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $73k · revenue +46%
  • RO
    REINS OF LIFE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +92%
  • LC
    LA CASA DE AMISTAD INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +829%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +14%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

2
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
3
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

7
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
11
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of St Joseph County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harris Baseball Softball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ANDERON AGOSTINO AND KELLER — $164,000 · OtherANDERON AGOSTINO AND KELLERKROC CORPS SALVATION ARMY — $23,000 · OtherKROC CORPS SALVATION ARMYEPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF NORTHERN INDIANA — $18,000 · OtherHARVARD GLEE GLUB ALUMNI INC — $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $13,500 · Other+43 more — $140,470 · Other+43 moreHARRIS BASEBALL SOFTBALL INC — $81,000 · Recreation & SportsHARRIS BASEBALL …YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $73,250 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICE B…+1 more — $1,250 · Human ServicesTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthALCOHOL & ADDICTIONS RESOURCE CENTER INC — $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $500 · HealthTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $2,500 · EducationIndiana University Foundation — $750 · EducationYELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART — $1,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$372,970Recreation & Sports$81,000Human Services$74,500Health$5,000Education$3,250Arts & Culture$3,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARRIS BASEBALL SOFTBALL INC — $81,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $73,250 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetHARVARD GLEE GLUB ALUMNI INC — $14,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALCOHOL & ADDICTIONS RESOURCE CENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARRIS BASEBALL SOFTBALL INC
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds HARVARD GLEE GLUB ALUMNI INC
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
  • Who funds REINS OF LIFE INC
  • Who funds MISHAWAKA LIONS CLUB INC
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds THE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds ALCOHOL & ADDICTIONS RESOURCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds LA CASA DE AMISTAD INC
  • Who funds REAL SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of St Joseph County IncIN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Vera Z Dwyer Charitable Trust Uad 121920 · Asante Foundation Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Bowsher the Booher Foundation · Radiology Inc Foundation · Memorial Hospital of South Bend Inc · Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cartwright Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Cartwright Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Cartwright Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph