How much did RADIOLOGY INC FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 93% of RADIOLOGY INC FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

cont medmed technologistwaybrothersbig sistersboysgirls

2021

education technologistbrothersbig sismedical educationboysgirlselk

2022

education technologistsmedical educationjosephboys girlsbrothers

2023

brothersboys girls

2024

technologist educationboys girlsbrothers

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500

Median grant

States reached

$257

Total assets

Largest grants

Beacon Health Foundation$2,500
Foodbank of Northern Indiana$1,250
Faith Mission of Elkhart$1,250
State Street The Pax Center$1,250
HANNAHS HOUSE$1,250
Hope Ministries$1,000
Goshen Health Fund$1,000
Hospice of Elkhart$1,000
Center for Hospice$1,000
IVY Tech Foundation$1,000
Beacons Children Hospital$1,000
Ronald McDonald House$1,000
American Cancer Society$1,000
Riverbend Cancer Services$850
Center for the Homeless$750

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$259k · 57 repeat orgs$227k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$259k

$226k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%

+52%

Still filing today

28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BH
Beacon Health Foundation
5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +439%
FM
Faith Mission of Elkhart
5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +23%
5F
525 FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +35%

Funded once

UW
UNITED WAY SJC
one grant, 2020 · $103k
UW
UNITED WAY ELKHART
one grant, 2020 · $52k
OF
Oaklawn Foundation
one grant, 2022 · $51k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Family Haven Inc

To provide care and support to individuals with developmental disabilities. the organization houses and cares for 4 to 5 adults with developmental disabilities. a safe home is provided in which each resident can develop to his or her…

Human Services

Indiana United Methodist Children's

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services

Sunshine House Inc

To nurture and inspire the human spirit with care, compassion, partnership and integrity.

Human Services

The Resident Home Corporation

Provides residential services, skill development, support services, and mental health service to children and adults with developmental disabilities.

Human Services

David's House Inc

David's house provides a home away from home environment for families of sick or injured children.

Health

A Friends House Inc

A friends house believes that all children warrant a loving, caring and safe environment, no matter what circumstances they have encountered in life. the mission is to provide a home that addresses the physical and emotional needs of the…

Human Services

Mercy Home for Children Inc

Mercy home provides essential services for children and adults with developmental disabilities. mercy home's mission is to ensure the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities through the recognition of each person's…

—

Lifehouse Inc

Provide a lifetime of support for people with developmental disabilities.

—

St Joseph Infant and Maternity Home

St. Joseph Home creates a home for infants, children and adults with developmental disabilities who have complex support needs and use a wheelchair for mobility. The home focuses attention on the individual's medical, social, educational…

Human Services

San Mar Children's Home Inc

The organization provides family, community, and mental health services for at-risk children and supervises the administration and provision of such services by other organizations.

—

The Care Center of Indiana

The care center is dedicated to improving the lives of abused, neglected and at-risk children and their families through multidisciplinary efforts that support the identification, prevention, and intervention of child abuse and neglect.

Crime & Legal

The Bridge House Inc

We provide housing for children in the foster care system, support young adults aging out of foster care (ages 18-20), and offer wraparound services for foster, adoptive, and birth families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adec Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Margarets House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1/22

the rest of the field

10%

246/2,398

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/19

Grantees still filing

17/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$450,664Health$18,550Human Services$6,100Recreation & Sports$4,450Education$3,550Crime & Legal$1,200Youth Development$1,200Arts & Culture$350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of St Joseph County IncIN35.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · 1st Source Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Community Foundation · Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn · The Specialized Staffing Charitable · Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua · Asante Foundation Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Fields Foundation Irr Tua

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RADIOLOGY INC FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: 525 FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 821309846 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on 525 FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Radiology Inc Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Radiology Inc Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RADIOLOGY INC FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Radiology Inc Foundation?

More from the funding graph

RADIOLOGY INC FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Radiology Inc Foundation?

More from the funding graph