Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Bowsher the Booher Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2025
9
Organizations funded FY2024
56%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 9
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$1.6M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 56% of the organizations Bowsher the Booher Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 53% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving7$80k14%
FY20249$85k56%
FY20239$90k44%
FY20227$87k43%
FY20217$65k14%
FY20206$73k50%
FY20196$76k67%
FY20185$42kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$276kEducation$99kYouth Development$91kArts & Culture$59kHealth$52kPhilanthropy$39kHousing & Shelter$12k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($217k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Bowsher the Booher Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLa Casa de Amistad Inc: $108,700 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetLogan Community Resources Inc: $46,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of St Joseph County Inc: $38,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetThe Village a Community Musical Art Alliance Inc: $29,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetJunior Achievement of Northern in Inc: $21,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMichiana Public Broadcasting Corporation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Service Bureau of St Joseph County Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetReal Services Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for the Homeless Inc: $12,340 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGood Shepherd Montessori School Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBright Beginnings Family Childcare Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIris Family Support Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Muessel Ellison Mem Irr TuaMO28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn · Asante Foundation Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Fields Foundation Irr Tua · United Way of St Joseph County Inc · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bowsher the Booher Foundation with peer funders

About Bowsher the Booher Foundation

How much does Bowsher the Booher Foundation give?
Bowsher the Booher Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $80,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Bowsher the Booher Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (44%), Education (16%), Youth Development (15%).
Who are Bowsher the Booher Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: La Casa de Amistad Inc ($109k), Logan Community Resources Inc ($47k), United Way of St Joseph County Inc ($39k).
Does Bowsher the Booher Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 56% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Bowsher the Booher Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bowsher the Booher Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua, Carroll F V Char Tr-Main, Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua.
Where is Bowsher the Booher Foundation based?
Bowsher the Booher Foundation is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bowsher the Booher’s filings →

More from the funding graph