Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carrigan Family Foundation

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$432kReligion$80kRecreation & Sports$42kHuman Services$39kHealth$17kMembership Benefit$3kYouth Development$269
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Immaculate Conception Parish$15,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Boston College: $3k → 7%Creighton University: $2k → 12%University Of Minnesota: $3k → 11%Concordia University: $3k → 14%UC Berkeley: $3k → 10%Cornelia Connelly Center: $10k → 17%Big Shoulders Fund: $6k → 16%Carthage College: $5k → 9%St Louis University: $3k → 21%Carthage College: $3k → 10%Immaculate Conception Parish: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $10k → 13%Kenyon College: $3k → 12%Devry University: $3k → 7%Rock Valley College: $6k → 15%University Of Illinois: $3k → 19%Alcorn State University: $3k → 34%University of Minnesota: $3k → 11%Cornelia Connelly Center: $10k → 17%Baylor University: $3k → 16%St Louis University: $3k → 21%Immaculate Conception Parish: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $8k → 13%College Of Dupage: $3k → 7%University of Illinois: $3k → 19%Alcorn State University: $3k → 34%CORNELIA CONNELLY CE NTER: $10k → 17%IMMACULATE CONCEPTION: $14k → 11%University Of Notre Dame: $5k → 13%CORNELIA CONNELLY CENTER: $10k → 17%Immaculate Conception Parish: $12k → 11%University Of Notre Dame: $5k → 13%Immaculate Conception Parish: $8k → 11%EDWARD W MOOSE KRAUS E CHA: $3k → 13%Immaculate Conception Parish: $2k → 11%Edward W Moose Krause Chapter: $3k → 13%University Of Notre Dame: $3k → 13%Edward W Moose Krause Chapter - National Football Foundation: $3k → 13%Edward W Moose Krause Chapter- National Football Foundation: $3k → 13%Edward W Moose Krause Chapter - National Football Foundation: $3k → 13%BIG SHOULDERS FUND: $73k → 14%Edward W Moose Krause Chapter- National Football Foundation: $3k → 13%Big Shoulders Fund: $36k → 14%IMMACULATE CONCEPTION: $12k → 14%University of Illinois at Chicago: $3k → 14%ST ANN'S SCHOOL: $5k → 14%LES TURNER ALS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%Depaul University: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
NE
MO
KY
MD
TN
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$506k · 51 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
33

Total granted

$506k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+45%

Still filing today

18%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    2× · 2018–2019 · $109k · revenue +67%
  • CARTHAGE COLLEGE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $9k · revenue +6%
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • RV
    Rock Valley College
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • SA
    ST ANN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
2
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
3
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
4
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
7
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
8
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
9
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
12
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis University; the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Immaculate Conception Parish: $51,100 · OtherImmaculate Conception ParishCORNELIA CONNELY CENTER FOR EDUCATION: $40,000 · OtherCORNELIA CONNELY CENTER FOR EDUCATIONIMMACULATE CONCEPTION: $26,215 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION+67 more: $305,128 · Other+67 moreBig Shoulders Fund: $108,500 · EducationBig Shoulders FundUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $30,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacCARTHAGE COLLEGE: $9,000 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · Education+9 more: $30,000 · Education+9 moreCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $4,500 · HealthBoys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc: $269 · Youth Development
Other$422,443Education$184,500Health$4,500Youth Development$269

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $108,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCARTHAGE COLLEGE: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Louis University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCreighton University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc: $269 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carrigan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carrigan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 53%
  • Boys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc: 53% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Carrigan Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Carrigan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carrigan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph