· Private foundation
The Caridad Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $138,050 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $186,550 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $48,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k7 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ULM Foundation | $57,500 |
| Nature Conservancy of Louisiana | $20,000 |
| JGS School | $10,000 |
| TILL1A | $10,000 |
| American Battlefield Trust | $10,000 |
| Franklin Parish Steer Project | $8,000 |
| First Methodist Church | $5,550 |
| Chennault Aviation Military Museum | $5,000 |
| Numerous Amounts Smaller than $2,000 | $4,500 |
| Manresa House of Retreats | $3,000 |
| St. Frederick High School | $2,500 |
| United Way of Northeast LA | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 21 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ABAmerican Battlefield Trust7× · 2017–2023 · $59k · revenue +82%
- LTLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC3× · 2017–2019 · $11k · revenue +5%
- ACA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +422%
Funded once
- DSDEXTER SOUTHFIELD FUNDone grant, 2019 · $10k
- BABYU ATHLETIC FUNDone grant, 2022 · $10k
- BABRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITALone grant, 2017 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation administered activities related to rendering care to the sick and injured or in the promotion of health, cooperated with other public and private institutions and agencies engaged in providing hospital and other health care…
The foundation provides philanthropic support services to assist the university of louisiana at lafayette in furthering its mission of achieving excellence in undergraduate and graduate education, research, and public service.
No board approved mission statement
The University of New Orleans Foundation's mission is to promote the well-being and advancement of the University of New Orleans and all the colleges, schools, departments, and divisions comprising it, and to develop, expand, and improve…
The patient-centered healthcare team of the lsu healthcare network will provide the highest quality, comprehensive medical care with compassion and professionalism, while maintaining our commitment to academic excellence
The mission of the foundation is to inspire donors to invest in the lsu health sciences center - new orleans ("hsc-no") and its future, to properly steward those contributions, and to help meet the ever evolving needs of the lsuhsc-no by…
Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…
Woldenberg village is dedicated to providing an environment for seniors that enhances and enriches the quality of their physical, mental and emotional life and to ensure that all of the organization's residents lead healthy and secure…
Provides housing for elderly and disabled persons and families under section 207/223(f) of the national housing act under an agreement with the department of hud.
University medical center will provide exceptional patient-centered care and a world-class academic experience through advanced research, leading technology and innovation.
The touro infirmary foundation has been established for the purpose of assisting touro infirmary to achieve its mission of continuing to provide quality healthcare and related services to the new orleans community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Northeast Louisiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Land Cruiser Heritage Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · Jbj Foundation Inc · The Scott Foundation · Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Caridad Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.