Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Capitol Ford Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$39kEducation$32kArts & Culture$30kCommunity Improvement$22kPhilanthropy$21kFood & Nutrition$14kHealth$14kYouth Development$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Santa Fe Children's Museum$15,000
St Vincent Hospital Foundation$10,000
Santa Fe Animal Shelter$5,000
Lensic Performing Arts$5,000
Rotary Club of Santa Fe$3,500
Cooking With Kids$2,500
Santa Fe Watershed Association$1,500
Rotary Club of Santa del Sur$1,500
Arbor Day Foundation$1,000
St Michaels High School$750
Sons of American Legion$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%The Food Depot: $6k → 12%The Food Depot: $3k → 12%The Food Depot: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$124k · 13 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
20

Total granted

$124k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+105%

Still filing today

38%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EV
    ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $29k · revenue +337%
  • THE FOOD DEPOT
    3× · 2019–2022 · $12k · revenue +51%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • LP
    LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +66%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SE
    SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +105%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Fe Botanical Garden

The santa fe botanical garden celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. in partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, science, conservation, community…

Environment
2
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
3
El Museo Cultural De Santa Fe Inc

Mission is to promote, present and preserve hispanic arts & culture of nm. showcasing, encourging & supporting participation of hispanics in local arts economy; and presenting creative & cultural richness of our heritage, including arts &…

Arts & Culture
4
Santa Fe International Literary Festival

Santa fe international literary festival (sfilf, or the festival) was incorporated as a nonprofit corporation in new mexico in 2023. the mission of sfilf is to connect writers, readers, and thinkers from around the world and close to home…

Arts & Culture
5
Santa Fe Playhouse

Santa fe playhouse creates community on stage and off by holding space for unexpected conversations through intriguing and vital programming. we create community by: -connecting artists with audiences through theatre. this includes: new…

Arts & Culture
6
Santa Fe Jazz Foundation Inc
—
7
Santa Fe Forest Coalition

Educate the public on forest conservation issues in New Mexico

Environment
8
Make Santa Fe Inc

The improvement of santa fe's economy through collaborative creativity in art, crafts, industry, and science.

—
9
Santa Fe Pro Musica Inc

Santa fe pro musica brings together outstanding musicians to inspire and educate audiences of all ages through the performance of great music.

Arts & Culture
10
Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce

The santa fe chamber of commerce's mission is to strengthen the local economy and serve as the voice of business in community affairs.

—
11
Santa Fe Farmers Market Institute

To advocate for farmers, ranchers and other land-based producers; provide equitable access to fresh, local food; own and operate a year-round venue for the santa fe farmers' market; and manage programs to help sustain a profitable,…

Food & Nutrition
12
The Center for Contemporary Arts of Santa Fe Inc

Through a variety of media created by emerging and established artists, the center for contemporary arts of santa fe, inc. (center) presents the arts of our time as vital elements in the cultural dialogue in santa fe and throughout new…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Cooking With Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NM Highlands University: $19,000 · OtherNM Highlands UniversityUnited Way: $18,000 · OtherUnited WayRotary Club of Santa Fe: $16,500 · OtherRotary Club of Santa FeLensic Performing Arts: $7,500 · OtherLensic Performing ArtsNDI New Mexico: $5,500 · OtherBoys & Girls Club: $5,000 · OtherThe Wildlife Center: $5,000 · OtherEsperanza Shelter for Battered Fami: $4,000 · OtherSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $5,000 · Other+20 more: $32,950 · Other+20 moreESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $28,525 · AnimalsESPANOLA VALLEY HU…SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsSANTA FE ANIMAL SH…SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE …MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED: $2,000 · Arts & CultureMOVING AR…THE FOOD DEPOT: $11,500 · Human ServicesST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $5,000 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropySANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $2,250 · Environment
Other$118,450Animals$33,525Arts & Culture$17,000Human Services$11,500Health$10,000Philanthropy$7,500Environment$5,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $28,525 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRotary Club of Santa Fe: $16,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOOKING WITH KIDS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Santa Fe ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COOKING WITH KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Livingry Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Brindle Foundation · Jm Lazarus Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Battelle Memorial Institute · C & I Roybal Charitable Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Capitol Ford Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Capitol Ford Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Capitol Ford Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Capitol Ford Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Capitol Ford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph