Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Caesars Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
103
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$1.9MEducation$1.7MFood & Nutrition$1.7MYouth Development$1.6MHuman Services$951kPhilanthropy$673kHealth$663kCommunity Improvement$614kOther$0
02FY2024 · 103 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 103 grants below total $3,077,333, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,440,833 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $363,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k40 grants · $198k
  • $10k–50k50 grants · $885k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $944k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
$10,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$292k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Meals on Wheels America$300,000
UNLV Foundation$250,000
International Center for Responsible Gaming$250,000
Boys and Girls Club of America$250,000
WASH Foundation$200,000
Legal Aid Center$150,000
National Park Trust$144,000
Public Education Foundation$120,000
Las Vegas Aces Foundation$100,000
St. Rose Dominican Health Foundation$75,000
Shelby County United Fund$55,000
Community Foodbank of New Jersey$50,000
Arbor Day Foundation$50,000
Junior Achievement of Southern Nevada, Inc.$45,833
A Place for US Atl Co$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tahoe Coalition for the Homeless: $8k → 8%COPE: $4k → 32%Second Wind Dreams: $50k → 13%BTST Cares Incorporated: $5k → 19%Hub Urban Ministries: $16k → 22%American Red Cross: $20k → 14%Catholic Charities of Southern NV: $25k → 13%Caridad: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
NV
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
KY
MD
NM
TN
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 76 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

76 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
208

Total granted

$8.2M
$3.1M

Still filing today

0%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $735k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyEmploymentFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    Meals on Wheels America
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.2M
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of America
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M
  • IC
    International Center for Responsible Gaming
    4× · 2021–2024 · $850k

Funded once

  • CT
    Clean the World
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • WB
    Women's Business Enterprise National Council
    one grant, 2021 · $140k
  • WS
    WBENC Southern Economic Tour
    one grant, 2020 · $140k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
2
Goodwill Industries of Central Oklahoma Inc

We help people overcome challenges to employment.

Employment
3
Goodwill Industries of Southern California

To transform lives through the power of work, gsc serves people with disabilities or other vocational challenges, as well as business by providing education, training, work experience and job placement services.

Employment
4
At the Crossroads

Atc reaches out to homeless youth and young adults and works with them to build healthy fulfilling lives. we remove common barriers to service by bringing our counselors onto the streets and shaping our support services around the needs of…

Human Services
5
Goodwill Industries of the Valley Works

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Human Services
6
Goodwill Industries Inc

Goodwill changes lives and strengthens communities through education, training and work. goodwill strives to increase self sufficiency of its participants through vocational evaluation, training and offering employment opportunities to…

Employment
7
Goodwill of the San Francisco Bay

Goodwill is a 501(c)3 local, nonprofit employment social enterprise that creates life changing opportunities for people in the community through training and the power of work. the people goodwill trains and places in jobs include people…

Employment
8
Goodwill Industries of the Valleys Inc

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Employment
9
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
10
United Way of Greater Toledo

United way of greater toledo unites the caring power of people to improve lives.

Philanthropy
11
Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona

See schedule o. goodwill of central and northern arizona (gcna) is committed to our vision of ending poverty through the power of work. goodwill takes a holistic approach to employment by providing job seekers the tools and resources to…

—
12
United Way of Benton & Lincoln Counties

United way works to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another. united way is a funder, a mobilizer, a convener and a fundraiser. united way is a community builder, connecting people through philanthropy,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for an Independent Tomorrow; the most unlike its peers is Cooper Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 337 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Meals on Wheels America: $1,205,000 · OtherMeals on Wheels AmericaBoys & Girls Club of America: $1,000,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of AmericaInternational Center for Responsible Gaming: $850,000 · OtherInternational Center for Responsible GamingUNLV Foundation: $560,000 · OtherNational Park Trust: $466,000 · OtherPublic Education Foundation: $445,000 · Other+182 more: $6,427,754 · Other+182 moreSECOND WIND DREAMS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUB URBAN MINISTRIES: $16,000 · Human ServicesCARIDAD INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNOBLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE LLC: $50,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $25,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR AN INDEPENDENT TOMORROW: $50,000 · EmploymentTHREE SQUARE: $45,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $40,000 · HealthCITY IMPACT INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalHANCOCK HOPE HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$10,953,754Human Services$121,000Education$75,000Employment$50,000Food & Nutrition$45,000Health$40,000Crime & Legal$20,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNOBLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE LLC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND WIND DREAMS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AN INDEPENDENT TOMORROW: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOOPER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUB URBAN MINISTRIES: $16,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCARIDAD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHANCOCK HOPE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nevada Community Foundation IncNV13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Mgm Resorts Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Caesars Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Caesars Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 337 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3.6M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Caesars’ filings →

    More from the funding graph