Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Byron Nelson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Public Benefit$1.3MReligion$645kEducation$530kRecreation & Sports$495kHealth$390kYouth Development$185kHousing & Shelter$75kHuman Services$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HILLS CHURCH$100,000
SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC$100,000
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
FIRST TEE OF FORT WORTH$40,000
FIRST TEE OF GREATER DALLAS$40,000
VALIANT HEARTS$25,000
COLLEGE GOLF FELLOWSHIP$25,000
HEARTS FOR HOMES$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $515k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $25k → 8%SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF: $100k → 14%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $20k → 8%SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF: $100k → 14%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $20k → 8%SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC: $100k → 14%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $15k → 8%SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF: $100k → 14%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $15k → 8%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $10k → 8%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 11 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$2.5M
$1.3M

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementReligionPublic BenefitRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Salesmanship Club of Dallas
    4× · 2017–2020 · $330k · revenue +16%
  • CG
    College Golf Fellowship
    9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +155%
  • HF
    HEARTS FOR HOMES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF ROANOKE TX
    one grant, 2020 · $1.3M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Smu Golf Foundation

Support men's and women's intercollegiate golf programs at SMU

Education
2
West Texas Youth Development Inc

First Tee - West Texas' mission is to impact the lives of young people by providing educational programs that build character, instill life-enhancing values, and promote healthy choices through the game of golf.

Recreation & Sports
3
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
4
Southern Texas Professional Golfers Association Foundation

To introduce and provide youth in south texas broad opportunities to experience the game of golf, develop their talent as players and themselves as individuals and promote scholarship benefits to as many qualified candidates as possible.…

Recreation & Sports
5
Salesmanship Club Foundation

Support momentous institute and the salesmanship club of dallas to promote the educational and mental health services for children and their families through an affiliated non-profit operating corporation. the salesmanship club of dallas…

Community Improvement
6
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
7
Central Texas Summit Christian School System Inc

Partners with families by providing quality academics, christian service education, and biblically integrated character development in order to equip students to impact their world.

—
8
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
9
Fort Worth Colonial Charities Inc (Fka Bfc Colonial Inc)

At fort worth colonial charities, we are dedicated to empowering the next generation through innovative educational, athletic, and enrichment programs supported by our investment. we believe in fostering not just skills, but confidence and…

Unclassified
10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
12
Global Golf

Provide pastoral chaplaincy and counseling support to women in professional and college golf; leadership and mentor training; offer Bible studies spiritual disciplines and evangelistic outreach to women in professional and college golf.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hearts for Homes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF ROANOKE TX: $1,325,000 · OtherCITY OF ROANOKE TXTHE HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST: $845,000 · OtherTHE HILLS CHURCH OF CHRISTABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $630,000 · OtherABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYFIRST TEE OF GREATER DALLAS: $195,000 · OtherFIRST TEE OF GREATER DALLAS+3 more: $195,000 · Other+3 moreSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $400,000 · Human ServicesSalesmanship…HEARTS FOR HOMES: $115,000 · Human ServicesHEARTS FOR H…Salesmanship Club of Dallas: $330,000 · Community ImprovementCollege Golf Fellowship: $215,000 · ReligionFORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 · Recreation & SportsOperation Second Chance Inc: $70,000 · Public Benefit
Other$3,190,000Human Services$515,000Community Improvement$330,000Religion$215,000Recreation & Sports$185,000Public Benefit$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $630,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $400,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas: $330,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCollege Golf Fellowship: $215,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetFORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetHEARTS FOR HOMES: $115,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetOperation Second Chance Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc ↗
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds College Golf Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS FOR HOMES ↗
  • Who funds Operation Second Chance Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Byron Nelson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Byron Nelson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Byron Nelson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Byron Nelson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Byron Nelson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph