Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Buzbee Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$279kInternational$130kHealth$91kHuman Services$56kPhilanthropy$15kCommunity Improvement$12kCivil Rights$11kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITANS PURSE$10,000
GRACE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY$10,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$8,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$6,000
MERCY SHIPS$5,000
MERCURY ONE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JESUS FILM PROJECT$4,000
FRIENDS OF ZION$3,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH MW$3,000
MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP$3,000
FAITH BIBLE COMMUNITY CHURCH$3,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$3,000
HOGAR INFANTIL$2,000
COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT NETWORK$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAN ANTONIO AMPUTEE FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%STANDUPGIRLCOM FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%AUSTIN PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $300 → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $2k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
NY
OR
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NM
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$651k · 34 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
19

Total granted

$651k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+18%

Still filing today

38%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionInternationalCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GRACE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +10%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $74k · revenue +134%
  • Mercy Ships International
    7× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • CI
    CAMBA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
5
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
6
Amnion Women's Center

Amnion's mission is to share the gospel of jesus christ and to protect and advocate for the sanctity of all human life, born and unborn, through the provision of abortion alternative services that empower mothers to choose life.

Health
7
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
8
The Center for Medical Progress

The Center For Medical Progress is dedicated to monitoring and reporting on medical ethics and advances through investigative journalism and other educational activities that address contemporary bioethical issues impacting human dignity.…

Health
9
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

—
10
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
11
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
12
Covenant Hospital Hobbs

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joni and Friends; the most unlike its peers is The Max and Billie Clark Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRISON FELLOWSHIP: $42,000 · OtherPRISON FELLOWSHIPWYCLIFFE BIBLE SOCIETY: $35,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE SOCIETYCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $34,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $29,500 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $21,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherHOGAR INFANTIL: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,300 · Other+38 more: $157,300 · Other+38 moreGRACE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY: $84,000 · EducationGRACE SCHOOL …MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $75,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYST…PREGNANCY CARE SERVICES INC: $5,000 · HealthPREGNANCY CAR…+2 more: $4,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $74,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S …+2 more: $3,000 · ReligionMercy Ships International: $28,000 · InternationalMercury One Inc: $23,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalCOMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT NETWORK INC: $12,000 · Community ImprovementCAMBA INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $3,000 · Human ServicesSTANDUPGIRLCOM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSAN ANTONIO AMPUTEE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $300 · Human Services
Other$392,600Education$84,000Health$84,000Religion$77,000International$55,500Community Improvement$17,000Human Services$16,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY: $84,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $74,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $28,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMercury One Inc: $23,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT NETWORK INC: $12,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAX AND BILLIE CLARK FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCAMBA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBRAZOS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTANDUPGIRLCOM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHORNS 4 HOPE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS WENDISH HERITAGE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Colson Center for Christian Worldview: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget18ten Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Pregnancy Resource Center: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRACE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAX AND BILLIE CLARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMBA INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Buzbee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Buzbee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Buzbee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph