Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Burton & Mindy Cohen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$428k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$673kHuman Services$605kYouth Development$223kReligion$112kHealth$60kPhilanthropy$30kArts & Culture$30kRecreation & Sports$18k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $185k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN$83,400
LIGUORI ACADEMY$51,960
JEVS HUMAN SERVICES$50,000
CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL$40,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES (JFCS)$30,000
CHABAD OF PENN STATE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES$30,000
COLEL CHABAD$25,000
MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION$25,000
GOLDEN SLIPPER CLUB$25,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $30k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $30k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $30k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 7%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $41k → 22%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $35k → 22%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $35k → 22%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $30k → 22%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $25k → 22%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $24k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 14 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+51%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LIGUORI INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $239k · revenue +95%
  • JH
    JEVS HUMAN SERVICES
    5× · 2020–2025 · $230k · revenue +49%
  • H'
    HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $223k · revenue +275%

Funded once

  • OO
    OFFICE OF CATHOLIC EDUCATION
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • HP
    HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +51%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF OFANIM
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heights Philadelphia

Heights is a new kind of organization, an economic mobility catalyst. we believe that creating pathways to educational and workforce success for low-income, black and brown, and first-generation-to-college students is the keystone of a…

Education
2
Youth Empowerment Services

To re-engage out-of-school youth with alternative educational programs and job connections, life skills training,counseling, media and technology skills

Education
3
Cheder Chabad - Philadelphia

Cheder Chabad - Philadelphia educates boys and girls from nursery through 8th grade with a dual curriculum in Jewish and General Studies

Education
4
Mesivta High School of Greater Philadelphia

The mesivta high school of greater philadelphia is a jewish orthodox boys' high school, educating students in grades 9-12 in torah and secular disciplines.

Education
5
Philadelphia Youth for Change Charter School Inc

To empower young adults (17-20 year-olds) to develop skills and connect to opportunities by fostering an environment of love, support, and respect for their whole person. students graduate high school and successfully transition to college…

Education
6
Philadelphia Electrical & Technology Cha

The mission of the philadelphia electrical and technology charter high school is to develop students who will be employable in the emeraging high-tech industries; while giving students a strong foundation in the core academic…

Education
7
Philadelphia Youth Network Inc

Philadelphia youth network (pyn) equips young people to build lifelong skills, pursue meaningful careers, and embrace change with confidence - so they can thrive in the workforce, experience economic mobility, and strengthen their…

Youth Development
8
The Philadelphia Education Fund

The mission of the philadelphia education fund (pef) is to create equitable access to opportunities for students by providing resources and expertise that build paths to college and career success. pef focuses on philadelphia public school…

Youth Development
9
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
10
Jewish Parent Cooperative School Inc

Jcs is a parent participation elementary school, collaboratively governed by parents and teachers designed to foster a lifelong love of learning and meaningful connection to hashem.

Education
11
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
12
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Neighborhood Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mitzvah Circle Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIGUORI INC: $238,877 · EducationLIGUORI INCHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $223,100 · EducationHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INCCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL: $182,500 · EducationCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOLTHE GESU SCHOOL INC: $35,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationJEVS HUMAN SERVICES: $230,000 · OtherJEVS HUMAN SERVICESHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN: $83,400 · OtherHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDENCHABAD OF PENN STATE INC: $62,300 · OtherCHABAD OF PENN STATE INCMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $60,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLEL CHABAD: $50,000 · OtherCOLEL CHABADGOLDEN SLIPPER CLUB: $42,500 · OtherGOLDEN SLIPPER CLUBMERCY CAREER TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL: $42,345 · OtherMERCY CAREER TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOLJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES (JFCS): $30,000 · Other+3 more: $31,280 · OtherMERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INC: $189,500 · Human ServicesMERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MIN…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $90,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHIL…MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $65,000 · Human ServicesMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDAT…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Education$689,477Other$686,825Human Services$344,500Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIGUORI INC: $238,877 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetJEVS HUMAN SERVICES: $230,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $223,100 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INC: $189,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL: $182,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GESU SCHOOL INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIGUORI INC ↗
  • Who funds JEVS HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GESU SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connelly FoundationPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connelly Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Paul E Kelly Foundation · The Howley Foundation · The Maguire Foundation · Beatty Helen D Groome Uw · The Gordon Charter Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Business Leadership Organized for Catholic Schools

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Burton & Mindy Cohen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Burton & Mindy Cohen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Burton & Mindy Cohen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Burton & Mindy Cohen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Burton & Mindy Cohen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph