Skip to content
The Buchalter Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Buchalter Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2017
30
Grants FY2017
8
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

90% of The Buchalter Foundation’s FY2017 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2017 names 22 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What it funds
01FY2017 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k23 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $87k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$1,213,604
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$87,257
THE GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC$33,086
BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC$30,042
BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
B CURED INC$15,000
ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE$7,510
FOODALLERGYORG$5,000
KIDS IN CRISIS$5,000
INNISFREE FOUNDATION INC ATTN MARIL BIALOUSZ$2,500
CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION$2,500
THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY$1,500
GREENWICH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL$1,500
NYULMC OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT$1,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 8% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TABOR ACADEMY: $250 → 8%ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $8k → 8%YOU CARE: $30 → 11%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1.2M → 7%HABITAT FOR HUNANITY: $250 → 10%THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY: $2k → 6%INNISFREE FOUNDATION INC ATTN MARIL BIALOUSZ: $3k → 9%WGA CSF: $404 → 9%NYULMC OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $275 → 28%KIDS IN CRISIS: $5k → 9%SHARSHERET: $360 → 7%CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $87k → 7%WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%FOODALLERGYORG: $5k → 17%GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%NEW YORK ROAD RUNNER: $1k → 17%WILLIAM RAVEIS CHARITABLE FUND INC: $260 → 9%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $50 → 17%THE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $825 → 9%NORWALK GRASSROOTS TENNIS & EDUCATION: $500 → 9%THE GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $33k → 9%BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $30k → 9%YMCA GREENWICH: $16k → 9%GREENWICH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL: $2k → 9%THE FAMILY CENTER INC: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
3
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
9
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Innisfree Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,300,861 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $30,042 · HealthBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthB CURED INC: $15,000 · HealthALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $7,510 · Health+3 more: $910 · HealthGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $33,086 · EducationChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherFOODALLERGYORG: $5,000 · OtherKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $5,000 · OtherINNISFREE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · OtherGREENWICH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC: $1,500 · Other+7 more: $3,694 · OtherTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $825 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $275 · EnvironmentNORWALKSTAMFORD GRASSROOTS TENNIS & EDUCATION INC: $500 · Recreation & SportsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $500 · Civil RightsHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $250 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$1,300,861Health$78,462Education$35,836Other$33,694Environment$2,600Recreation & Sports$500Civil Rights$500Housing & Shelter$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,300,861 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $33,086 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $30,042 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetB CURED INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $7,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNISFREE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREENWICH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $825 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Center Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORWALKSTAMFORD GRASSROOTS TENNIS & EDUCATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 47% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTABOR ACADEMY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Buchalter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Buchalter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Family Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2018) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Buchalter’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home