Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Brian and Sheila McMillan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182025.

Human Services$107kRecreation & Sports$74kPhilanthropy$50kEducation$42kPublic Benefit$10kEnvironment$5kInternational$5kHousing & Shelter$3kHealth$2kOther$30k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$10,000
LIONS INK$10,000
COMMUNITY FOR THE COMMONS$5,000
BRYCES BLESSINGS THE BRYCE BORCA FOUNDATION$5,000
THE SUNSHINE STOP$2,500
BOUNTIFUL BASKET FOOD SHELF$2,500
OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION$2,500
LAKE MINNETONKA KLONDIKE DOG DERBY$1,500
LAKE MINNETONKA ASSOCIATION$1,500
BEER CITY DOG BISCUITS$1,000
EXCELSIOR UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$500
GRAPEVINE GIVING FOUNDATION$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BRYCES BLESSINGS THE BRYCE BORCA FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%BRYCES BLESSINGS THE BRYCE BORCA FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%BRYCES BLESSINGS THE BRYCE BORCA FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%ICA FOOD SHELF: $13k → 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $13k → 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $10k → 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $8k → 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $5k → 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $5k → 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $3k → 11%LIONS INK: $10k → 11%LIONS INK: $10k → 11%LIONS INK: $10k → 11%LIONS INK: $3k → 11%LIONS INK: $3k → 11%LIONS INK: $3k → 11%LIONS INK: $1k → 11%LIONS INK: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MN
MI
NY
MA
WY
IN
OH
CA
MD
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of The Brian and Sheila McMillan Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Brian and Sheila McMillan Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$266k · 20 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
19

Total granted

$266k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

65%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $56k · revenue +20%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +9%
  • OH
    OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • BJ
    Becoming Jackson Whole
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +11%
  • SC
    SO-HI COMMUNITY PARK
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • KK
    KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Hospital Foundation

The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.

2
Conservation Minnesota

Conservation minnesota's mission is to turn our shared conservation values into state priorities and provide you with the information you need to make decisions for your family, community and future.

Environment
3
Minneapolis Parks Foundation

The Minneapolis Parks Foundation transforms human lives through parks and public spaces by aligning philanthropic investment and community vision.

Recreation & Sports
4
Minnesota Zoo Foundation

The minnesota zoo foundation raises contributed income and supports conservation and animal care programs on behalf of the minnesota zoo. the mission of the minnesota zoo is to connect people, animals, and the natural world to save…

Animals
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Minnesota Chamber Foundation

The organization's mission is to bring stakeholders together to promote prosperity and long-term growth of minnesota's economy.

Public Benefit
7
Minnesota Community Foundation

Purpose: we inspire generosity, advocate for equity and invest in community-led solutions. aspiration: we envision an equitable, just and vibrant minnesota where all communities and people thrive. values: we listen. we innovate and learn.…

8
Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership

The mission of the greater msp partnership is to accelerate regional competitiveness and inclusive economic growth through job creation, capital investment and execution of strategic initiatives. the partnership works to strengthen our…

Community Improvement
9
The Minnesota Fastbreak Foundation

The mission of the minnesota fastbreak foundation is to have a meaningful impact in the communities where we live, work and play.

Human Services
10
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
11
The Minnesota Camp Fire Foundation

Ensure camp fire minnesota's strong future. with nature as the catalyst, camp fire minnesota energizes youth to discover their spark so their futures glow brighter.

Youth Development
12
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Treehouse Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mt Carmel High School Music Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Community FoundationsLand Conservation Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Community Health CentersRotary Club FoundationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsSchool Parent OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionPublic School District Foun…Youth Sports Booster Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%17%<5yr15%17%5–10yr21%10%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr13%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%8%<5yr15%18%5–10yr21%22%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr13%16%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
14%
2,791/19,737

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
12/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $55,725 · Human ServicesINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCI…Lion's Fire — $39,000 · Human ServicesLion's FireBRYCES BLESSINGS THE BRYCE BORCA FOUNDATION — $12,500 · Human ServicesBRYCES BLESSINGS THE BRYCE BORCA FOU…COMMUNITY FOR THE COMMONS — $67,250 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY FOR THE COMMONSSO-HI COMMUNITY PARK — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsSO-HI COMMUNITY PARK+1 more — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDAT…OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION — $18,500 · PhilanthropyOPEN HANDS FOUNDA…+2 more — $1,300 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …+2 more — $2,350 · Education+2 moreBOUNTIFUL BASKET FOOD SHELF — $5,000 · OtherBOUNTIFUL BAS…SUNSHINE STOP — $3,700 · OtherSUNSHINE STOPKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA — $3,000 · OtherKAPPA KAPPA G…KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $3,000 · OtherKAPPA KAPPA G…EXCELSIOR METHODIST CHURCH — $2,000 · OtherPAWS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · OtherPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION — $1,500 · OtherPAWS — $1,500 · OtherPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 · OtherPATHFINDER IN…BEER CITY DOG BISCUITS — $2,500 · OtherBEER CITY DOG…+20 more — $10,902 · Other+20 moreBecoming Jackson Whole — $10,000 · Public BenefitLake Minnetonka Association — $5,250 · Environment
Human Services$107,225Recreation & Sports$73,750Philanthropy$49,800Education$42,350Other$40,102Public Benefit$10,000Environment$5,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOR THE COMMONS — $67,250 over 8y, 10% of budgetINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $55,725 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLion's Fire — $39,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HANDS FOUNDATION — $18,500 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetBRYCES BLESSINGS THE BRYCE BORCA FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBecoming Jackson Whole — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetLake Minnetonka Association — $5,250 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEER CITY DOG BISCUITS — $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE MINNETONKA KLONDIKE DOG DERBY — $1,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC — $1,262 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA- EXCELSIOR INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDINOMIGHTS — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGrapevine giving foundation — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Breath of Hope Lung Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNETONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKenwood Elementary PTA — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL MUSIC FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOND BETWEEN — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN24.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Richard G Jacobus Family Foundation · Tradition Family Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Xcel Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Brian and Sheila McMillan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Brian and Sheila McMillan Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Brian and Sheila McMillan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph