Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Brewster Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$514k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$246k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.9MHealth$605kEnvironment$176kSocial Science$110kCrime & Legal$60kPublic Benefit$35kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $399k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$246,281
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$152,500
CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$15,000
CEDARS - SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY$15,000
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION$10,000
BREWSTER CONSERVATION TRUST$10,000
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL$10,000
RAND CORPORATION$10,000
DENNIS CONSERVATION TRUST$10,000
THE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
THE URBAN INSTITUTE$5,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$2,500
ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD$1,000
CAPE COD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $25k → 16%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE: $25k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $246k → 14%THE URBAN INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $228k → 11%THE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $25k → 16%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE: $25k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $240k → 14%THE URBAN INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $168k → 11%THE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $25k → 16%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE: $25k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $233k → 14%THE URBAN INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $153k → 11%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $25k → 16%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE: $25k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $227k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $153k → 11%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $221k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $153k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $208k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $153k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $110k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $153k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $153k → 11%CEDARS - SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%CEDARS - SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%CEDARS - SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%CEDARS - SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%CEDARS - SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%CEDARS - SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%CEDARS - SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%CEDARS - SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $95k → 8%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 16 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
0

Total granted

$2.3M
$0

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentSocial ScienceEducationHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +5%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +63%
  • THE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +27%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

    Education
    2
    Boston Architectural College

    The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

    —
    3
    Trustees of Boston University

    Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

    —
    4
    Trustees of Dartmouth College

    Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

    Education
    5
    Marine Biological Laboratory

    The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

    Science & Tech
    6
    Cornell University

    Education, research, medical services and other public services.

    Education
    7
    Harvard Conservation Trust

    To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

    Environment
    8
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    9
    United States Naval Institute

    Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

    —
    10
    President and Fellows of Harvard College

    Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

    Education
    11
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute

    Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

    —
    12
    Trustees of Tufts College

    Education and Research

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Princeton University; the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    14/14
    Grantees still filing
    11/14
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,536,689 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,310,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherCAPE COD HEALTHC…HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $135,000 · OtherHARVARD MEDICAL …NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE: $100,000 · OtherNATIONAL ACADEMY…MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $50,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GE…THE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherTHE MILLER CENTE…BROWN UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $8,000 · OtherTHE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST: $80,000 · EnvironmentBREWSTER CONSERVATION TRUST: $80,000 · EnvironmentTHE COMPACT OF CAPE COD CONSERVATION TRUSTS INC: $8,000 · EnvironmentASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC: $8,000 · EnvironmentCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $120,000 · HealthTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $70,000 · Social ScienceTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $20,000 · Social ScienceEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $60,000 · Crime & LegalThe Rand Corporation: $20,000 · Public Benefit
    Education$2,846,689Other$548,000Environment$176,000Health$120,000Social Science$90,000Crime & Legal$60,000Public Benefit$20,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,536,689 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,310,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST: $80,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetBREWSTER CONSERVATION TRUST: $80,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE COD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMPACT OF CAPE COD CONSERVATION TRUSTS INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
    • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
    • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
    • Who funds THE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST ↗
    • Who funds BREWSTER CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
    • Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
    • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
    • Who funds THE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
    • Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
    • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds CAPE COD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
    • Who funds THE COMPACT OF CAPE COD CONSERVATION TRUSTS INC ↗
    • Who funds ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Bilezikian Family Foundation IncMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Bilezikian Family Foundation Inc · Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Trust · Mutual Bancorp Foundation Inc Fka Cape Cod 5 Foundation Inc · Cape Cod Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Brewster Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Brewster Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
    • Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc: 100% of income from government
    • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
    • Brewster Conservation Trust: 8% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Brewster Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Brewster Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brewster’s filings →

    More from the funding graph