Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Breslauer Soref Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$173k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.3MReligion$1.0MPhilanthropy$381kInternational$334kCivil Rights$235kHuman Services$211kArts & Culture$121kHousing & Shelter$93kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
World Union for Progressive Judaism$50,000
AABGU$26,800
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Central Fund of Israel$25,000
The Washington Institute for Near East P$25,000
Music Theater West$21,350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Los Angeles Family House: $20k → 14%Central Fund of Israel: $25k → 6%American Associates of Ben Gurion University: $251k → 17%AMERICAN ASSOC BEN GURION UNIVERSIT: $200k → 16%The Investigative Project: $25k → 14%American Associates of Ben Gurion University: $220k → 17%AABGU: $175k → 16%The Washington Institute: $76k → 14%AMERICANS 4 BEN GURION UNIVERSITY: $206k → 17%AABGU: $27k → 16%The Washington Institute: $71k → 14%American Associates of Ben Gurion University: $205k → 17%The Washington Institute: $67k → 14%Music Theater West: $21k → 14%American Associates of Ben Gurion U: $201k → 17%The Washington Institute: $65k → 14%MUSICAL THEATRE WEST: $20k → 14%American Associates of Ben Gurion U: $200k → 17%The Washington Institute for Near East P: $25k → 14%Project Ijithad: $25k → 17%Project Ijithad: $25k → 17%World Union for Progressive Judaism: $100k → 17%WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM: $53k → 17%World Union for Progressive Judaism: $50k → 17%World Union for Progessive Judiasim: $50k → 17%Jewish Long Beach: $122k → 14%WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM: $28k → 17%Jewish Federation of Long Beach: $75k → 14%Jewish Long Beach: $72k → 14%JEWISH LONG BEACH: $65k → 14%Jewish Long Beach: $62k → 14%JEWISH LONG BEACH: $62k → 14%Assistance League of Long Bch: $60k → 14%Jewish Federation of Long Beach: $50k → 14%Jewish Federation of Long Beach: $50k → 14%Jewish Federation of Long Beach: $37k → 14%Jewish Federation of Long Beach: $35k → 14%Jewish Federation of Long Beach: $35k → 14%Jewish Community Foundation of Long Beach: $32k → 14%Jewish Community Foundation of Long Beach: $32k → 14%Jewish Community Foundation of Long Beach: $32k → 14%Jewish Federation of Long Beach: $25k → 14%BEACH HILLEL: $25k → 14%Assistance League of Long Beach: $20k → 14%Assistance League of Long Beach: $18k → 14%Assistance League of Long Beach: $18k → 14%Ronald McDonald House: $34k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 17 repeat orgs$559k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
12

Total granted

$2.8M
$484k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+66%

Still filing today

24%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $309k · revenue +51%
  • AL
    Assistance League of Long Beach
    5× · 2017–2021 · $126k · revenue +11%
  • MT
    MUSICAL THEATRE WEST
    2× · 2022–2023 · $35k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • A4
    AMERICANS 4 BEN GURION UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $206k
  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOC BEN GURION UNIVERSIT
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • TI
    The Investigative Project
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange County

Support the jewish community.

3
Jewish Community Center of Long Beach

To develop and strengthen Jewish identity, foster Jewish values, and enrich the community of Long Beach and West Orange County.

Human Services
4
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

5
Jewish Endowment Foundation

The jewish endowment foundation of louisiana (jef), chartered in 1967, ensures a secure future and an enduring legacy by serving as an essential resource for jewish and non-jewish philanthropy.

Philanthropy
6
Jack E & Rachel Gindi Foundation

The organization's charitable giving is directed to the jewish community and community at large for the benefit of organizations that provide education and religious benefits and services.

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey

The jewish federation of southern new jersey cares for those in need, enhances jewish life and ensures the continuity of a vibrant jewish community locally, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
8
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
9
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
10
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

11
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati

The Jewish Federation of Cincinnati develops and connects leaders, contributors, organizations, and ideas to build an inclusive Jewish community that helps people in need, supports Israel, and assures a vibrant Jewish future.

Philanthropy
12
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange County and the most unlike its peers is Girls of Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

American Associates of Ben Gurion University — $676,000 · OtherAmerican Associates of Ben Gurion UniversityAmerican Associates of Ben Gurion U — $401,000 · OtherAmerican Associates of Ben Gurion UJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTY — $382,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTYJewish Federation of Long Beach — $336,500 · OtherJewish Federation of Long BeachTHE WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM LTD — $235,000 · OtherTHE WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM LTDAMERICANS 4 BEN GURION UNIVERSITY — $206,000 · OtherAMERICANS 4 BEN GURION UNIVERSITYAABGU — $201,800 · OtherAABGUAMERICAN ASSOC BEN GURION UNIVERSIT — $200,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOC BEN GURION UNIVERSITAssistance League of Long Beach — $125,632 · Other+16 more — $516,408 · Other+16 moreWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $308,600 · InternationalWASHINGTON…Central Fund of Israel — $25,000 · InternationalCentral Fu…JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $60,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO — $15,000 · PhilanthropyMUSICAL THEATRE WEST — $35,000 · Arts & CultureINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE — $5,000 · Arts & CultureORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP — $21,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationLONG BEACH DAY NURSERY — $5,000 · EducationGIRLS OF DOG RESCUE — $5,000 · Animals
Other$3,280,840International$333,600Philanthropy$75,000Arts & Culture$40,000Housing & Shelter$21,000Education$15,000Animals$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTY — $382,500 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $308,600 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAssistance League of Long Beach — $125,632 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICAL THEATRE WEST — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP — $21,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH DAY NURSERY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTY
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY
  • Who funds Assistance League of Long Beach
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds MUSICAL THEATRE WEST
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LONG BEACH DAY NURSERY
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE
  • Who funds GIRLS OF DOG RESCUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Breslauer Soref Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph