Skip to content
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc.

$72M
Granted FY2025still arriving
76
Grants FY2025still arriving
30
States reached
$6.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$442MEducation$13MScience & Tech$3.2M
02FY2025 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 76 grants below total $61,108,218, the rows itemized in this filing. The $71,947,853 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,839,635 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $4.1M
  • $250k+49 grants · $57M
$450,000
Median grant
30
States reached
$220M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$5,996,194
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL$5,907,893
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$2,956,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CANCER INSTITUTE$2,868,391
DANA FARBER CANCER INSITUTE$2,700,000
THE ASCO CANCER FOUNDATION$2,591,250
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$1,995,273
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PERELMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$1,950,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$1,857,714
YALE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH$1,474,999
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,306,208
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$1,294,751
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$1,232,999
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$1,159,500
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,065,361
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BREAST CANCER THINK TANK: $25k → 13%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $250k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $11M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$8.3M · 76% · 22 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL RESEARCH

Middle East and North Africa$1.2M · 11% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL RESEARCH

East Asia and the Pacific$950k · 9% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL RESEARCH

North America (Canada and Mexico)$450k · 4% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL RESEARCH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$370M · 84 repeat orgs$28M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

84 repeat relationships: 62 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
25

Total granted

$370M
$27M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+3%

Still filing today

63%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthScience & TechPhilanthropyHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29M · revenue +162%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +44%
  • CC
    CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $12M · revenue +1%
  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $3.2M · revenue 0%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
    one grant, 2024 · $2.3M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
9
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
10
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
11
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is The Larry Ellison Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
82/86
Grantees still filing
64/86
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $47,520,029 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $27,053,243 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL: $15,140,864 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILLREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $14,231,750 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $12,723,789 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUTMD ANDERSON: $11,827,018 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $8,287,659 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $7,064,562 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $6,929,253 · Other+38 more: $56,400,014 · Other+38 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $17,305,871 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLV…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $15,469,214 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $12,375,064 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $12,049,989 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND ST…Yale University: $9,054,728 · EducationYale UniversityCornell University: $8,513,366 · EducationCornell UniversityUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $8,029,427 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine: $7,307,500 · EducationVanderbilt University: $6,262,997 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $5,565,807 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $5,370,000 · Education+27 more: $46,707,388 · Education+27 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $29,076,348 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer In…CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $12,079,528 · HealthCONQUER CANCER FOUNDA…MAYO CLINIC: $7,209,500 · HealthMAYO CLINICBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $5,920,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS…American Association for Cancer Research Inc: $4,343,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $4,029,887 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3,779,865 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $3,175,000 · HealthALLIANCE FOR CLINICAL TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION: $3,170,058 · Health+20 more: $13,426,828 · Health+20 moreCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $3,223,000 · Science & TechThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $1,565,000 · Science & Tech+2 more: $140,000 · Science & TechNorthwestern University: $3,104,653 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $1,377,700 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LARRY ELLISON FOUNDATION: $415,000 · Philanthropy
Other$207,178,181Education$154,011,351Health$86,210,514Science & Tech$4,928,000Recreation & Sports$3,104,653International$1,377,700Philanthropy$915,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $29,076,348 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $17,305,871 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $15,469,214 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $12,375,064 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $12,079,528 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $12,049,989 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $9,054,728 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $8,513,366 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $8,029,427 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $7,307,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $7,209,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $7,064,562 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetVanderbilt University: $6,262,997 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $5,920,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $5,565,807 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $5,370,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $5,110,208 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $5,055,385 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc: $4,343,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4,201,519 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4,030,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $4,029,887 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3,779,865 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $3,663,295 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $3,446,605 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $3,223,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $3,175,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CLINICAL TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION: $3,170,058 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetNorthwestern University: $3,104,653 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $2,977,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,939,998 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS: $2,862,823 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,519,358 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $2,069,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $2,039,394 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $2,015,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $2,015,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $1,889,514 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $1,881,744 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $1,841,250 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $1,565,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHMH HOSPITALS CORPORATION: $1,480,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $1,377,700 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $1,340,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $1,091,667 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC: $1,040,000 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $950,093 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECOG RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $925,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds American Association for Cancer Research Inc ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CLINICAL TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…Johns Hopkins Univers…Washington UniversityAlliance for Clinical…Cornell UniversityMayo ClinicUniversity of Pittsbu…The Children's Hospit…Georgetown UniversityMetavivor Research an…Alliance Nctn Foundat…Fred Hutchinson Cance…
American Cancer Society IncGA25.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Washington University · Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation · Cornell University · Mayo Clinic · University of Pittsburgh · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Georgetown University · Metavivor Research and Support Inc · Alliance Nctn Foundation · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Jhpiego Corporation: 65% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • University of Central Florida Research Foundation Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Breast Cancer Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home