Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

$15M
Granted FY2024still arriving
109
Grants FY2024still arriving
42
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$33MEducation$15MRecreation & Sports$264kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$21M
02FY2024 · 109 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 109 grants below total $12,774,119 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,639,183 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,865,064 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k56 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k26 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+14 grants · $9.0M
$30,432
Median grant
42
States reached
$113M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$1,962,448
ALLIANCE NCTN FOUNDATION$922,160
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$764,553
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI CANCER CENTER$736,549
ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$637,733
NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION INC$579,938
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC$531,176
DUKE UNIVERSITY$498,422
ADAPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGIES$494,055
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$470,561
SWOG - CLINICAL TRIALS INITIATIVE LLC$417,954
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$395,497
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$295,675
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH -$290,190
SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH$163,996
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $2.9M → 9%ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $638k → 22%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $587k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $879k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $1.3M → 13%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $772k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $2.6M → 9%NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION INC: $580k → 22%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $783k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $1.0M → 13%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $531k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $2.3M → 9%NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION INC: $428k → 22%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $651k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $894k → 13%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $492k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $2.2M → 9%ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $372k → 22%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $480k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $787k → 13%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $470k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $2.0M → 9%NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION INC: $335k → 22%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $471k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $727k → 13%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $422k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $1.9M → 9%ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $323k → 22%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $421k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $473k → 13%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $765k → 15%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $355k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $1.9M → 9%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $688k → 15%ADAPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGIES: $494k → 9%MAYO CLINIC: $1.2M → 9%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $472k → 15%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $435k → 15%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $327k → 15%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $322k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $668k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $520k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $431k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $395k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $333k → 14%ALLIANCE NCTN FOUNDATION: $922k → 14%ALLIANCE NCTN FOUNDATION: $704k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$49M · 120 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

120 repeat relationships — 96 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

120
27

Total granted

$49M
$677k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+24%

Still filing today

58%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $357k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +51%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +132%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2020 · $174k
  • WP
    White Plains Hospital Medical Centergraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $69k · revenue +47%
  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Centergraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +91%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
8
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
9
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
10
The Nebraska Medical Center

The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health
11
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
12
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hmh Hospitals Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Eastern Maine Medical Center Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Cen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Military Veterans SupportCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%75%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%1/161
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,404

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/99
Grantees still filing
78/99
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC — $16,925,189 · HealthMAYO CLINICDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $4,266,006 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,825,339 · HealthECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCNRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION INC — $1,629,635 · HealthALLIANCE NCTN FOUNDATION — $1,625,843 · Health+65 more — $6,276,315 · Health+65 moreUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $5,537,384 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CH…THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $3,383,443 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYUTMD ANDERSON — $1,659,724 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONSWOG - CLINICAL TRIALS INITIATIVE LLC — $1,122,203 · OtherSWOG - CLINICAL TRIALS INITIATIVE …ADAPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGIES — $1,050,030 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI — $844,528 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $736,201 · Other+62 more — $6,461,585 · Other+62 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY — $4,306,195 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $4,025,626 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYUniversity of Chicago — $3,183,925 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS — $671,555 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $646,577 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $514,435 · Education+14 more — $1,398,056 · Education+14 moreNorthwestern University — $263,750 · Recreation & SportsMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION — $5,804 · Community Improvement
Health$32,548,327Other$20,795,098Education$14,746,369Recreation & Sports$263,750Community Improvement$5,804

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC — $16,925,189 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $4,306,195 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $4,266,006 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $4,025,626 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $3,183,925 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,825,339 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetNRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION INC — $1,629,635 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetALLIANCE NCTN FOUNDATION — $1,625,843 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS — $671,555 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $646,577 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $514,435 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Research Institute — $501,890 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $406,043 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYale University — $392,144 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $336,636 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH CONSORTIUM INC — $302,200 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $292,581 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $290,403 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE INC — $287,567 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE — $276,230 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $273,938 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $263,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC — $229,546 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES — $222,307 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $191,080 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONSPIRIT HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $149,427 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $146,403 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $143,470 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetThedaCare Inc — $140,584 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMontana Cancer Consortium — $140,434 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE — $140,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $137,643 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $132,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES — $111,769 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSt Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s — $105,404 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGROUP HEALTH INC — $104,708 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA ONCOLOGY RESEARCH ASSOCIATION — $104,408 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic — $103,714 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRhode Island Hospital — $101,936 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $99,770 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $97,858 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $96,018 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $90,424 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $88,804 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAM — $87,864 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetGEISINGER CLINIC — $79,341 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center — $68,536 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $68,224 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE NCTN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH CONSORTIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliance Nctn Foundat…Mayo ClinicThe Children's Hospit…American Heart Associ…Cystic Fibrosis Found…American Cancer Socie…Yale UniversityVanderbilt University…The Children's Oncolo…Public Health Institu…Mayo Clinic Group Ret…Johns Hopkins Univers…
Alliance Nctn FoundationIL97× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliance Nctn Foundation · Mayo Clinic · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · American Heart Association Inc · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Yale University · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · The Children's Oncology Group Foundation Inc · Public Health Institute · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Johns Hopkins University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine — 100% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Research Institute Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Veterans Education and Research Association of Northern New England Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health Services Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Morton Plant Mease Health Care Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 161 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines