Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Metavivor Research and Support Inc

To fund stage iv metastatic breast cancer mbc research to transition the disease from terminal to chronic yet manageable with a good quality of life, provide support and education for patients living with mbc and promote awareness of mbc to increase research funding.

$3.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$900k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$15MScience & Tech$14MEducation$4.1MRecreation & Sports$500kYouth Development$250kPublic Safety & Disaster$100k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.7M
$200,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$900,000
UNIVERSITY TEXAS A&M$450,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$450,000
LAB CENTRAL$450,000
H LEE MOFFITT CANCER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$450,000
WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY$200,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$200,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER (KUMC)$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$200,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$200,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LAB CENTRAL: $450k → 8%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $450k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $700k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $500k → 11%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $250k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE USC NORRIS COMPRE: $250k → 14%ROSSWELL PARK COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $250k → 13%HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $450k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $650k → 10%UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO: $250k → 16%UT HEALTH TEXAS MCGOVERN: $250k → 16%UNIVERSITY TEXAS A&M: $450k → 22%H LEE MOFFITT CANCER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $450k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $250k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $350k → 16%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 14%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $400k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH-HUNTSMAN: $250k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $350k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $250k → 13%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $450k → 15%CASE WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $250k → 17%RUSH UNIVERSITY: $250k → 14%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 8%NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE: $250k → 8%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $250k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $250k → 11%CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF STANFORD: $250k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250k → 14%ROSSWELL PARK COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $250k → 13%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $250k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ANDERSON: $250k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL: $250k → 14%HOUSTON METHODIST: $250k → 16%LOMBARDI COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $250k → 14%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $250k → 15%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $500k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $500k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ANDERSON: $250k → 10%WAKE FOREST: $250k → 15%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $450k → 17%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $450k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $450k → 17%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERISTY: $450k → 19%BETH ISRAEL UNIVERSITY: $450k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 30 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
60

Total granted

$18M
$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+18%

Still filing today

57%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthScience & TechPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    5× · 2018–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +98%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +64%
  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2023 · $650k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +15%
  • RP
    ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $500k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
7
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
8
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Terasaki Inst for Biomedical Innovation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%48%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%1/102
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,463

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/61
Grantees still filing
48/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $1,350,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $1,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAUTMD ANDERSON — $950,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $650,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $600,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $550,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $550,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $500,000 · OtherROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE — $500,000 · OtherNIHNIA — $450,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $450,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER — $450,000 · Other+33 more — $5,400,000 · Other+33 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,200,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,200,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND …WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $700,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $600,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $550,000 · EducationNew York University — $500,000 · EducationCornell University — $450,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $450,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami — $450,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $450,000 · EducationTrustees for Harvard University — $400,000 · Education+18 more — $2,850,000 · Education+18 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,500,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Insti…Vanderbilt University Medical Center — $850,000 · HealthVanderbilt University Me…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $750,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING…BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $700,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS ME…H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $450,000 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CEN…NYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM — $450,000 · HealthNYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTE…UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $400,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MED…CITY OF HOPE — $400,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPEHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $300,000 · HealthTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL — $250,000 · HealthHEALTH RESEARCH INC — $250,000 · HealthUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS — $250,000 · HealthRush University Medical Center — $250,000 · Health+7 more — $550,000 · Health+7 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION — $500,000 · PhilanthropyROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyLAB CENTRAL INC — $450,000 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $150,000 · Science & TechThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $100,000 · Science & TechNorthwestern University — $500,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE DEPART INC — $100,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$13,400,000Education$10,800,000Health$7,350,000Philanthropy$700,000Science & Tech$700,000Recreation & Sports$500,000Public Safety & Disaster$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $850,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $750,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $700,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $700,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $600,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $550,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetNorthwestern University — $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $450,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $450,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $450,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAB CENTRAL INC — $450,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $450,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM — $450,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $450,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees for Harvard University — $400,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $400,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY OF HOPE — $400,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS — $250,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSA CANCER COUNCIL — $200,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE DEPART INC — $100,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Nebraska Medical Center — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…The Trustees of Colum…Johns Hopkins Univers…Cornell UniversityPresident and Fellows…Yale UniversityAmerican Heart Associ…The Breast Cancer Res…American Lung Associa…Rheumatology Research…The Children's Hospit…American Chemical Soc…
American Cancer Society IncGA26.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Johns Hopkins University · Cornell University · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Yale University · American Heart Association Inc · The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc · American Lung Association · Rheumatology Research Foundation · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · American Chemical Society

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Metavivor Research and Support Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines