Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Alliance Nctn Foundation

To provide scientific and operational infrastructure for the implementation of innovative clinical and translational research in academic and community settings and to reduce the impact of cancer on people by engaging a comprehensive research network, conducting high quality multidisciplinary cancer control, prevention and treatment…

$4.7M
Granted FY2023
85
Grants FY2023
32
States reached
$481k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of Alliance Nctn Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Mayo Clinic, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 66 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Alliance Nctn Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 79 organizations, $5M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

34
’20
65
’21
56
’22
79
’23
66
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Health$18M
02FY2023 · 85 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 85 grants below total $4,538,599 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,698,625 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $160,026 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k15 grants · $113k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$22,000
Median grant
32
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$481,168
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$423,328
MAYO CLINIC$418,884
MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC$169,900
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS$153,423
DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$147,500
SOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH CONSORTIUM INC$135,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$132,127
CANCER RESEARCH FOR THE OZARKS$125,500
AURORA HEALTH CARE INC$120,000
FRANCISCAN HEALTH INDIANAPOLIS$99,100
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA$93,851
THEDACARE INC$93,000
COLUMBUS NCORP$88,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$80,197
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAYO CLINIC: $1.6M → 9%NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION: $107k → 11%DONALD GUTHIE FOUNDATION: $78k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII: $131k → 9%ST FRANCIS RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION INC: $75k → 6%HOUSTON METHODIST RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $63k → 16%NCORP OF THE CAROLINAS (PRISMA HEALTH-UPSTATE): $48k → 10%ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO: $67k → 13%CANCER RESEARCH CONSORTIUM OF WEST MICHIGAN: $68k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $48k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $51k → 21%VIA CHRISTI HOSPITALS WICHITA INC: $129k → 16%ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL: $48k → 11%CANCER RESEARCH FOR THE OZARKS: $126k → 15%THE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $108k → 21%BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WI SYSTEM: $47k → 10%THEDACARE INC: $93k → 11%THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $79k → 17%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $55k → 11%SOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH CONSORTIUM INC: $135k → 15%RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL: $49k → 14%FRANCISCAN HEALTH INDIANAPOLIS: $99k → 8%DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $148k → 15%THE VALLEY HOSPITAL: $108k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE: $74k → 10%SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC: $53k → 19%MAYO CLINIC: $237k → 9%NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION: $60k → 11%KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $134k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII: $51k → 9%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $53k → 16%MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $170k → 12%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $47k → 21%THE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $49k → 21%THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $64k → 17%FRANCISCAN HEALTH INDIANAPOLIS: $75k → 8%COLUMBUS NCORP: $88k → 15%MAYO CLINIC: $134k → 9%MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $48k → 12%AURORA HEALTH CARE INC: $120k → 14%HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF CNY PC: $129k → 14%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $86k → 12%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $67k → 15%HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF CNY PC: $59k → 14%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $55k → 12%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS: $87k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $1.2M → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $481k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
KS
AR
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 83 repeat orgs$817k to everyone else

83 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2023, 18 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

83
24

Total granted

$13M
$274k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+36%

Still filing today

60%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +34%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $589k · revenue +32%
  • AV
    ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITALS WICHITA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $293k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • BW
    Baltimore Washington Medical Center Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +4%
  • TO
    THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $24k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA
    one grant, 2020 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
8
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
9
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
10
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
11
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
12
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis and the most unlike its peers is Eastern Maine Medical Center Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Cen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Military Veterans SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%77%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/130
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,435

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/85
Grantees still filing
71/85
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC — $4,110,863 · HealthMAYO CLINICASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITALS WICHITA INC — $293,400 · Health+59 more — $3,450,494 · Health+59 moreTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $986,848 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $657,046 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUTMD ANDERSON — $548,590 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $390,970 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL …MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $292,090 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin Madison — $228,752 · Other+46 more — $2,982,640 · Other+46 moreUniversity of Chicago — $1,704,534 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS — $588,549 · EducationAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SUR…THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $234,396 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF …WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $232,745 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYDUKE UNIVERSITY — $225,171 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $140,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $126,665 · Education+9 more — $344,950 · Education+9 moreNorthwestern University — $63,500 · Recreation & Sports
Health$7,854,757Other$6,086,936Education$3,597,510Recreation & Sports$63,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC — $4,110,863 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $1,704,534 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS — $588,549 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITALS WICHITA INC — $293,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMorton Plant Hospital Association Inc — $255,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC — $242,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $234,396 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $232,745 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $225,171 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION INC — $167,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE INC — $158,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $156,716 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH CONSORTIUM INC — $156,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $150,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $140,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $126,665 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA HEALTH CARE INC — $117,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAM — $111,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL INC — $108,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThedaCare Inc — $93,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOSF Healthcare System — $92,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $88,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $86,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL CORVALLIS — $85,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDONALD GUTHRIE FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetST FRANCIS RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION INC — $81,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM — $81,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $78,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRhode Island Hospital — $78,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CLOUD HOSPITAL — $77,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKES EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS — $73,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES — $73,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALTRU HEALTH SYSTEM — $64,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $63,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTIDALHEALTH PENINSULA REGIONAL INC — $61,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR VETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION — $55,950 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $50,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Health System Inc — $48,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE — $48,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPrisma Health-Upstate — $48,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER — $47,225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $46,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $45,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYale University — $44,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $40,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEastern Maine Medical Center Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Cen — $37,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLANKENAU INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $32,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITALS WICHITA INC ↗
  • Who funds Morton Plant Hospital Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH CONSORTIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTA HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ThedaCare Inc ↗
  • Who funds OSF Healthcare System ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliance for Clinical…Mayo ClinicAmerican Heart Associ…American Cancer Socie…Yale UniversityVanderbilt University…The Children's Oncolo…The Children's Hospit…Public Health Institu…Cystic Fibrosis Found…Johns Hopkins Univers…Reach Out and Read Inc
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology FoundationIL97× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation · Mayo Clinic · American Heart Association Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Yale University · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · The Children's Oncology Group Foundation Inc · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Public Health Institute · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · Johns Hopkins University · Reach Out and Read Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alliance Nctn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine — 100% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Northwest Hospital Center Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
  • The Valley Hospital Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Tidalhealth Peninsula Regional Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Morton Plant Hospital Association Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 130 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home