Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Boswell-Kennett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$156k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$400kReligion$66kArts & Culture$57kEnvironment$30kHealth$27kInternational$15kEmployment$7kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$345k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERISTY OF MISSOURI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$75,000
MARIN ART & GARDEN CENTER$36,638
WESTIMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$10,088
LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE$10,000
MANDOS MISSION$5,000
SUMMER SEARCH$5,000
SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION$1,000
K9REUNITE$500
MARTIS CAMP FOUNDATION$500
MARIN ACADEMY$500
MARK DAY SCHOOL$500
THE WEST POINT INN ASSOCIATION$250
ADOPT A FAMILY$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%ADOPT A FAMILY: $250 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%Naral Pro-Choice America: $1k → 14%REMAKE: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$600k · 20 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$600k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+8%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthEmploymentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MARIN ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $298k · revenue +67%
  • MA
    Marin Art and Garden Center
    5× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +81%
  • LT
    LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHNS COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • TD
    The Diocese of California
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mills College

Mills college is an independent liberal arts college for women and gender nonbinary students, with graduate programs for all genders. the college educates students to think critically and communicate responsibly and effectively, to accept…

2
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

3
Marine Corps Association

The mission of the marine corps association (mca) is to support the marine corps by disseminating knowledge of military art and science among marines, provide opportunities for professional development for marines, and to foster the spirit…

4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
California Apartment Association

The organization's mission is to represent the ethical members of the rental housing industry in all aspects of government affairs within the state of california, and to provide information, products and services which contribute to the…

6
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

7
Monterra Credit Union

Passionately deliver relevant products, services, and education tailored to help our members, employees, and communities achieve their financial goals.

Public Benefit
8
Marin General Hospital

To be the destination for health and healing in the north bay.

Health
9
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
10
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
11
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
12
Boy Scouts of America 35 Marin Council

The marin council of the boy scouts of america, a california nonprofit public benefit corporation, is chartered by the boy scouts of america to promote the scouting program in marin county.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is League to Save Lake Tahoe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsEducation Equity LeadershipPregnancy Support ServicesClassical Music EnsemblesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Youth CampsChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr11%21%35–55yr13%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr17%8%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%75%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,952

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARIN ACADEMY — $298,150 · EducationMARIN ACADEMYUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $80,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION+1 more — $2,800 · EducationIndividual grant recipient — $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOHNS COMMUNITY CHURCH — $40,000 · OtherST JOHNS COMMUNITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWESTIMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $20,500 · OtherWESTIMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURC…University of Missouri — $11,000 · OtherUniversity of MissouriPlanned Parenthood — $10,000 · Other+17 more — $23,985 · Other+17 moreMarin Art and Garden Center — $53,038 · EnvironmentLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE — $30,000 · ReligionKanakuk Ministries — $10,000 · ReligionMANDOS MISSION — $5,000 · ReligionALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $10,088 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $6,250 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $1,000 · HealthSUMMER SEARCH — $7,000 · EmploymentSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $4,200 · Arts & Culture
Education$380,950Other$200,485Environment$53,038Religion$45,000Health$17,338Employment$7,000Arts & Culture$4,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARIN ACADEMY — $298,150 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $80,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMarin Art and Garden Center — $53,038 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $10,088 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKanakuk Ministries — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $6,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMANDOS MISSION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $4,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARK DAY SCHOOL — $3,375 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION — $1,210 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIS CAMP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DBA MARTIS CAMP FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdopt A Family — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRemake — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Boswell-Kennett Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Boswell-Kennett Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Boswell-Kennett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph