Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Boss Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$636kHealth$74kCivil Rights$16kArts & Culture$15kSocial Science$15kInternational$10kEnvironment$8kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$327k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST$20,000
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS & EXPRESSION$5,000
CANCER FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA$5,000
SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS$5,000
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$3,500
TGR FOUNDATION$3,000
CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA$3,000
SANSUM CLINIC$2,500
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$2,000
805 UNDOCUFUND$2,000
THE BRIGID ALLIANCE$2,000
DIGNITY MOVES$1,000
MISSION SCHOLARS$1,000
HARVARD LAW SCHOOL$500
CLUBBED THUMB$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $2k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $2k → 17%805 UNDOCUFUND: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$531k · 21 repeat orgs$344k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$531k
$320k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+31%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CANCER FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA
    6× · 2018–2025 · $30k · revenue +70%
  • CT
    Clubbed Thumb Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +161%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $10k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • FU
    Fordham Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $263k · revenue +31%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • AI
    ASPEN INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
11
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tiger Woods Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $344,000 · OtherDARTMOUTH COLLEGEPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $36,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD+20 more: $110,600 · Other+20 moreFordham University: $262,500 · EducationFordham University+4 more: $14,000 · EducationCANCER FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA: $30,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST: $20,000 · HealthSANSUM CLINIC: $7,500 · HealthSANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS: $6,000 · Health+1 more: $1,500 · HealthClubbed Thumb Inc: $15,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,000 · Civil RightsDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 · InternationalNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $7,500 · Environment
Other$491,100Education$276,500Health$65,000Arts & Culture$15,500Civil Rights$12,000International$10,000Environment$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFordham University: $262,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetClubbed Thumb Inc: $15,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMission Scholars: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIGNITYMOVES: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABORTION CARE NETWORK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMontecito Community Foundation: $500 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST ↗
  • Who funds Clubbed Thumb Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds SANSUM CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission Scholars ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DIGNITYMOVES ↗
  • Who funds 805 UNDOCUFUND ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds ABORTION CARE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NCGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Montecito Community Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The John C Mithun FoundationCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The John C Mithun Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · California Community Foundation · La Centra-Sumerlin Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Boss Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Boss Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Boss Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Boss Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Boss Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph