Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Blue Waters Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$406k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.0MEnvironment$683kArts & Culture$636kRecreation & Sports$118kAnimals$40kHuman Services$2kReligion$2k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $839k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$100,711
Median grant
6
States reached
$21M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 98% of reported assets are held in Berkshire Hathaway A.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S SCHOOL$405,648
THE SALISBURY FOUNDATION$306,916
ST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS$304,896
HISTORIC ANNAPOLIS$149,862
BLUES FOUNDATION$122,284
JAZZ FOUNDATION$104,533
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY WATERSHEDS STEWARDS ACADEMY$100,899
ST MARY'S ROYAL BLUE CLUB$100,711
ARUNDEL RIVER FEDERATION$100,689
CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY$99,694
MARYLAND HALL FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS$60,010
SPCA OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY$30,000
FROM THE HEART PRODUCTIONS$25,000
BALTIMORE BLUES SOCIETY$10,000
DC BLUES SOCIETY$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 18% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FROM THE HEART PRODUCTIONS: $25k → 10%JAZZ FOUNDATION: $105k → 17%BLUES FOUNDATION: $122k → 17%ST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS: $305k → 6%WEST NOTTINGHAM ACADEMY: $47k → 10%THE SALISBURY FOUNDATION: $34k → 13%BALTIMORE BLUES SOCIETY: $10k → 19%BLUES FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%ST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS: $34k → 6%WEST NOTTINGHAM ACADEMY: $34k → 10%THE SALISBURY FOUNDATION: $32k → 13%BLUES FOUNDATION: $22k → 17%SPCA OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY: $30k → 6%WEST NOTTINGHAM ACADEMY: $34k → 10%THE SALISBURY FOUNDATION: $31k → 13%BLUES FOUNDATION: $22k → 17%ST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS: $23k → 6%WEST NOTTINGHAM ACADEMY: $31k → 10%THE SALISBURY FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%BLUES FOUNDATION: $21k → 17%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $23k → 6%WEST NOTTINGHAM ACADEMY: $20k → 10%THE SALISBURY FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%BLUES FOUNDATION: $16k → 17%ST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS: $14k → 6%WEST NOTTINGHAM ACADEMY: $15k → 10%BLUES FOUNDATION: $12k → 17%ST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS: $12k → 6%ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY WATERSHEDS STEWARDS ACADEMY: $101k → 6%ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $406k → 6%CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY: $203k → 6%ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $197k → 6%HISTORIC ANNAPOLIS: $150k → 6%ST MARY'S ROYAL BLUE CLUB: $101k → 6%CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 6%CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY: $62k → 6%MARYLAND HALL FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS: $60k → 6%CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY: $52k → 6%ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $43k → 6%ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $41k → 6%ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $34k → 6%ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $34k → 6%ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $24k → 6%CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY: $22k → 6%ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $17k → 6%ARUNDEL RIVER FEDERATION: $101k → 6%ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $8k → 6%SEVERNA PARK HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of The Blue Waters Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 69%.

The Blue Waters Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 13 repeat orgs$506k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$2.9M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+45%

Still filing today

85%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $488k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationAnimalsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $439k · revenue +78%
  • SA
    ST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $388k · revenue +115%
  • TB
    The Blues Foundation Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $243k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SP
    SEVERNA PARK HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • VL
    VANDEGRIFT LACROSSE CLUB BOOSTERS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • LI
    LIGHTHOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blue Water Baltimore

To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.

Environment
2
Chesapeake Audubon Society

The chesapeake audubon society works in the maryland region to promote the stewardship of natural ecosystems through conservation, restoration, education, and advocacy.

Environment
3
Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc

Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…

Community Improvement
4
North Baltimore Aquatic Club Inc

The north baltimore aquatic club leads the nation in competitive swimming. our diligently designed, professionally coached and internationally renowned program encourages the development of character and self-discipline. these qualities,…

Recreation & Sports
5
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
6
Chesapeake Rivers Association

Protect and Restore the Chesapeake Bay particularly the Severn River

Environment
7
Cape Ann Museum Inc

To foster an appreciation of the quality and diversity of life on cape ann, past and present; to further the knowledge and enjoyment of cape ann history and art; to collect and preserve significant information and artifacts; and to…

Arts & Culture
8
Anacostia Riverkeeper Inc

To protect and restore the Anacostia River for all those who live work and play in the watershed and to advocate for a clean healthy river for all its communities.

Environment
9
The Association for the Preservation of the Potomac

To preserve and protect the Presidential yacht Potomac for use as a classroom and museum dedicated to imparting to present and future generations the continuing impact of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Era. All programming initiatives at…

Arts & Culture
10
Mobile Baykeeper Inc

Provide citizens a means to protect the beauty, health and heritage of the Mobile Bay Watershed, Alabamas waterways and coastal communities.

Environment
11
Historical Society Harford Cou

Preserve the history of Harford County, Maryland

—
12
Annapolis Maritime Museum Inc

The annapolis maritime museum educates youth and adults about the annapolis areas rich maritime heritage and the ecology of the chesapeake bay through programs, exhibits, and community events. continued on schedule o

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Annapolis Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peninsula Athletic League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH & SCHOOL: $803,359 · OtherST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH & SCHOOLTHE SALISBURY FOUNDATION: $592,866 · OtherTHE SALISBURY FOUNDATIONST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS INC: $387,763 · OtherST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS INCJAZZ FOUNDATION: $104,533 · OtherJAZZ FOUNDATION+5 more: $37,291 · OtherCHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $438,571 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY…ARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC: $108,689 · EnvironmentARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERAT…Anne Arundel County Watershed Stewards Academy Inc: $100,899 · EnvironmentAnne Arundel County Wa…CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $35,062 · EnvironmentThe Blues Foundation Inc: $243,252 · Arts & CultureThe Blues Founda…HISTORIC ANNAPOLIS INC: $149,862 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC ANNAPOL…MARYLAND HALL FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS INC: $72,850 · Arts & CultureMARYLAND HALL FO…From The Heart Productions: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBaltimore Blues Society Inc: $19,500 · Arts & CultureWEST NOTTINGHAM ACADEMY: $180,911 · EducationST MARYS ROYAL BLUE CLUB INC: $100,711 · Youth DevelopmentSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MD INC: $39,500 · AnimalsPeninsula Athletic League Inc: $2,300 · Recreation & SportsLIGHTHOUSE INC: $1,500 · Health
Other$1,925,812Environment$683,221Arts & Culture$510,464Education$180,911Youth Development$100,711Animals$39,500Recreation & Sports$2,300Health$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $438,571 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS INC: $387,763 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetThe Blues Foundation Inc: $243,252 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetWEST NOTTINGHAM ACADEMY: $180,911 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetHISTORIC ANNAPOLIS INC: $149,862 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC: $108,689 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetAnne Arundel County Watershed Stewards Academy Inc: $100,899 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetST MARYS ROYAL BLUE CLUB INC: $100,711 over 1y, 17% of budgetMARYLAND HALL FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS INC: $72,850 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MD INC: $39,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $35,062 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBaltimore Blues Society Inc: $19,500 over 7y, 26% of budgetDC BLUES SOCIETY INC: $13,500 over 6y, 22% of budgetPeninsula Athletic League Inc: $2,300 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ANNE'S SCHOOL OF ANNAPOLIS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Blues Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST NOTTINGHAM ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC ANNAPOLIS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Anne Arundel County Watershed Stewards Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS ROYAL BLUE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND HALL FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
  • Who funds Baltimore Blues Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds DC BLUES SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Peninsula Athletic League Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Anne Arundel CoMD21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Blue Waters Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Blue Waters Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Historic Annapolis Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Conservancy Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Arundel Rivers Federation Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Maryland Hall for the Creative Arts Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blue Waters’ filings →

More from the funding graph