Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Blossom Siegel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.8MInternational$66kHuman Services$54kReligion$28kEnvironment$27kArts & Culture$25kCivil Rights$23kRecreation & Sports$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COLLABORATIVE OF ORANGE$36,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FRACTURED ATLAS INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP KESEM: $5k → 14%HART COMMUNITY HOMES: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
UT
MD
AZ
NC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$310k · 12 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
51

Total granted

$310k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+46%

Still filing today

58%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +202%
  • TB
    The Borgen Project
    2× · 2017–2018 · $9k · revenue +35%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OC
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION AND FAMILY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • JC
    JEWISH COLLABORATION OF OC
    one grant, 2018 · $45k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
2
J Street

To organize pro-israel, pro-peace, pro-democracy americans to promote us policies that embody our deeply held jewish and democratic values and that help secure the state of israel as a democratic homeland for the jewish people.

International
3
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
4
Israel Venture Network

The Organization is at the forefront of the social business arena for fourth sector in Israel, nurturing and growing this emerging sector and generating sustainable social impact by providing Israel's social businesses with knowledge,…

Education
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
7
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
8
Public Knowledge

Public knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. we work to shape policy on behalf of the public interest.

Public Benefit
9
Israel Team Advocates International Inc

Promote understanding and support for the people of israel

International
10
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
11
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
12
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Literacy Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
23/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OC: $1,000,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OCJEWISH COLLABORATIVE OF ORANGE: $223,000 · OtherJEWISH COLLABORATIVE OF ORANGE+50 more: $357,820 · Other+50 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $407,937 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF OR…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $36,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FU…The Borgen Project: $9,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $8,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC: $2,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,800 · InternationalFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePacific Symphony: $8,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsWASHINGTON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $7,500 · Recreation & Sports350ORG: $8,000 · EnvironmentScience & Environmental Health Network: $5,000 · EnvironmentMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $4,000 · EnvironmentANIMAL HAVEN INC: $10,000 · Animals
Other$1,580,820Philanthropy$443,937International$20,800Arts & Culture$18,500Recreation & Sports$17,500Environment$17,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $407,937 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $36,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition to Stop Gun Violence: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $10,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetThe Borgen Project: $9,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Symphony: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEED SAVERS EXCHANGE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetScience & Environmental Health Network: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHART COMMUNITY HOMES INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Village District Management Association Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE ARE GROUNDSWELL: $1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LITERACY PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetProject Hope Alliance: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUPPORT LOCAL ARTISTS AND MUSICIANS: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Coalition to Stop Gun Violence ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds The Borgen Project ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Symphony ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds VIOLENCE POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEED SAVERS EXCHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Science & Environmental Health Network ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Camino Verde Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Samueli Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · California Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Blossom Siegel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Blossom Siegel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blossom Siegel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph