Skip to content
The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0B
Granted FY2024still arriving
203
Grants FY2024still arriving
28
States reached
$187M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.8BHealth$840MEnvironment$801MArts & Culture$236MPhilanthropy$215MInternational$174MPublic Benefit$99MScience & Tech$93MOther$0
02FY2024 · 203 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $942k
  • $250k+197 grants · $1.0B
$1,519,000
Median grant
28
States reached
$12.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$186,794,463
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE$78,780,000
CHARTER FUND INC (DBA CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND)$55,520,000
RESOURCES LEGACY FUND$26,500,000
VITAL STRATEGIES INC$25,254,000
RESOLVE TO SAVE LIVES INC$23,250,000
C40 CITIES CLIMATE LEADERSHIP GROUP INC$20,000,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$20,000,000
SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC$19,900,000
MEMORIAL HERMANN FOUNDATION$19,161,000
CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS$16,666,000
THE CLEAN AIR FUND$14,300,000
VITAL STRATEGIES INC$13,058,000
MUSEUM OF LONDON$12,614,000
HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC$12,275,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $60.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MY CONNECT COMMUNITY: $25k → 16%ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC: $10k → 23%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $1.0M → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $1.0M → 17%CITY OF ASYLUM PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $900k → 14%MATRICULATE INC: $4.2M → 17%MATRICULATE INC: $3.9M → 17%MATRICULATE INC: $3.6M → 17%MATRICULATE INC: $216k → 17%MATRICULATE INC: $68k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $28.6M → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $12.3M → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $3.0M → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $1.5M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8B · 301 repeat orgs$415M to everyone else

301 repeat relationships: 125 still active in FY2024, 176 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

301
273

Total granted

$3.8B
$310M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+25%

Still filing today

72%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $995M · revenue +42%
  • CF
    CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $161M · revenue +553% · 94% of their budget
  • CF
    CHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND
    3× · 2022–2024 · $155M · revenue +22% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • WT
    WORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $90M · revenue -37% · 61% of their budget
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $44M · revenue -51%
  • CI
    CLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $18M · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Village Academies Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Neue Galerie New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

442 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 442 of the 635 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

58
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
58
Early backer (in before they grew)
438/442
Grantees still filing
283/442
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $994,905,722 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $167,061,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $59,700,000 · Education+44 more: $414,661,056 · Education+44 moreWORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: $65,801,500 · OtherWORLD HEALTH ORGANIZAT…STICHTING EUROPEAN CLIMATE FOUNDATION: $31,430,000 · OtherRocky Mountain Institute: $30,012,000 · OtherCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION: $114,120,000 · OtherCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATIO…CITIES FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT FUND INC: $30,008,000 · OtherHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $45,325,000 · Other+79 more: $555,954,976 · Other+79 moreCHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $154,810,000 · PhilanthropyCHARTER FU…ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $74,940,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLE…UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION: $54,125,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED STA…NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $40,000,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL P…ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $29,700,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD…BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $24,067,000 · PhilanthropyBATON ROUG…GATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS: $20,000,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $22,135,000 · PhilanthropyRESOURCES LEGACY FUND: $85,457,000 · EnvironmentRESOURCES …C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group Inc: $62,830,000 · EnvironmentC40 Cities…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $44,575,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLU…EARTHJUSTICE: $34,250,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTI…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $33,177,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RE…OCEANA INC: $21,665,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INCCarbon Mapper Inc: $19,000,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION: $17,500,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $13,615,000 · Environment+13 more: $57,554,000 · Environment+13 moreVITAL STRATEGIES INC: $241,224,690 · InternationalVITAL STRA…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $43,600,000 · InternationalAMERICAN F…International Rescue Committee INC: $32,860,000 · InternationalInternatio…WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $20,356,000 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $14,326,000 · International+5 more: $34,954,000 · International+5 moreNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $95,128,132 · Arts & CultureWORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $90,000,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $81,240,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL AND MUSEUM AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER: $30,000,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more: $37,093,330 · Arts & CultureCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $161,373,000 · HealthRESOLVE TO SAVE LIVES INC: $69,870,000 · HealthLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $39,800,000 · HealthMemorial Hermann Foundation: $19,161,000 · Health+7 more: $30,756,000 · Health
Education$1,636,327,778Other$872,651,476Philanthropy$419,777,000Environment$389,623,500International$387,320,690Arts & Culture$333,461,462Health$320,960,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $994,905,722 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetVITAL STRATEGIES INC: $241,224,690 over 5y, 63% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $167,061,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $161,373,000 over 5y, 94% of budgetCHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $154,810,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION: $114,120,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $95,128,132 over 5y, 11% of budgetWORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $90,000,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetRESOURCES LEGACY FUND: $85,457,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $81,240,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $74,940,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetRESOLVE TO SAVE LIVES INC: $69,870,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetC40 Cities Climate Leadership Group Inc: $62,830,000 over 5y, 48% of budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $59,700,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetUNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION: $54,125,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $45,325,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $44,575,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $43,600,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $40,000,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $39,800,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $35,269,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $34,250,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $33,295,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $33,177,500 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $32,860,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNew York University: $30,300,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $30,012,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetCITIES FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT FUND INC: $30,008,000 over 4y, 89% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION: $30,000,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetNATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL AND MUSEUM AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER: $30,000,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $29,700,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $28,500,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $25,790,000 over 5y, 37% of budgetBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $24,067,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetRESULTS FOR AMERICA: $22,921,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $22,000,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetOCEANA INC: $21,665,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $20,356,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $20,202,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetGATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS: $20,000,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $19,345,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budget50CAN INC: $19,176,956 over 3y, 41% of budgetMemorial Hermann Foundation: $19,161,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetCarbon Mapper Inc: $19,000,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetPROSPERITY NOW: $18,300,000 over 4y, 57% of budgetCLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION: $17,500,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetTARGET ALS FOUNDATION INC: $16,000,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTENNESSEE STATE COLLABORATIVE ON REFORMING EDUCATION: $15,909,000 over 2y, 65% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VITAL STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCES LEGACY FUND ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds RESOLVE TO SAVE LIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds CITIES FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KIPP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL AND MUSEUM AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RESULTS FOR AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Walton Family Foundat…Gates FoundationDoris Duke Charitable…The Andrew W Mellon F…Freedom Together Foun…Carnegie Corporation …The Ford FoundationThe William & Flora H…New Venture FundCity FundBooth Ferris Foundati…The Kresge Foundation
Walton Family Foundation IncAR63.2× affinity49 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Walton Family Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Freedom Together Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · The Ford Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · New Venture Fund · City Fund · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The Kresge Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Rodel Charitable Foundation - De: 20% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Edvestors Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Fund for Educational Excellence Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Arts for Learning Maryland Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Museum of Science: 0% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 635 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bloomberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home