Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Blessing Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$323kEducation$205kHousing & Shelter$185kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kHuman Services$34kRecreation & Sports$20kHealth$12kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNERSTONE CHURCH$38,000
ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION$25,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$15,000
VALOR CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES$1,000
LEGACY PREGNANCY CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WELLSPRING COMMUNITY: $4k → 3%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $3k → 9%WELLSPRING COMMUNITY: $4k → 3%WELLSPRING COMMUNITY: $4k → 3%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
WY
OH
CA
CO
AZ
NC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$795k · 12 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

$795k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+13%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionInternationalHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $191k · revenue +194%
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +89%
  • CG
    College Golf Fellowship
    4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +155%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • M
    MAKE-A-WISH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • RC
    REGENCY CHRISTIAN WORSHIP CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Horizon Christian School

Private, christian education: pre-kindergarten - 12th grade. our mission is to build a solid foundation for life by providing students with an excellent education that integrates academic achievement, biblical truth, and christ-like…

Education
2
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
3
Summit Classical Christian School

Summit Classical Christian School is a PreK-12 school that exists to cultivate generations of joyful disciples of Christ by partnering with faithful Christian families to educate their children from a Biblical worldview using classical…

Education
4
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
5
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
6
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
7
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
8
Valley Christian School

Valley christian school exists to partner with christian families who desire educational excellence, taught through a biblical worldview, so their children will be prepared for a lifetime of faithfulness and service to jesus christ.

—
9
Landmark Christian School

Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.

—
10
Champion Christian College Inc

To develop christ-centered servant leaders through a challenging academic environment in order to impact the world for the kingdom of god.

Education
11
Faith Christian School of Rocky Mount Inc

Faith christian school challenges students to learn, lead and serve in order to explore god's divine calling in their lives. faith christian school guides students on their spiritual journeys by providing excellent instruction, practice,…

—
12
Covenant Classical School

To train our students to live and think according to a biblical christ-centered world view. we accomplish this by partnering with parents to provide a rigorous, classical education that instills a lifelong love of learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arma Dei Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Aid Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOURNEY CHURCH COLORADO: $160,474 · OtherJOURNEY CHURCH COLORADOCORNERSTONE CHURCH: $131,586 · OtherCORNERSTONE CHURCHOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES: $24,346 · OtherOPEN DOOR MINISTRIESLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $15,000 · Other+12 more: $26,920 · Other+12 moreALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $191,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCA…ARMA DEI ACADEMY INC: $12,000 · EducationARMA DEI ACADEMY INC+1 more: $2,100 · EducationHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $185,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INCSHIELD 616 INC: $35,050 · Crime & LegalCollege Golf Fellowship: $20,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 · ReligionWELLSPRING COMMUNITY: $12,000 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesSHERIDAN KIDS LIFE: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCKY MOUNTAIN AID FOUNDATION: $2,500 · InternationalBELIEVE IN HAITI: $1,000 · International
Other$358,326Education$205,100Housing & Shelter$185,000Crime & Legal$35,050Religion$21,000Human Services$15,000Youth Development$4,000International$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $191,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $185,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHIELD 616 INC: $35,050 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCollege Golf Fellowship: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetARMA DEI ACADEMY INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWELLSPRING COMMUNITY: $12,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLISTEN FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSHERIDAN KIDS LIFE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN AID FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetVALOR CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHIELD 616 INC ↗
  • Who funds College Golf Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMA DEI ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds LISTEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN KIDS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN AID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VALOR CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds BELIEVE IN HAITI ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Christian School ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Blessing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Blessing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Blessing Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Blessing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blessing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph