· Private foundation
The Bigbird Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HUNTINGTON THEATRE COMPANY INC | $34,000 |
| PHOENIX CHARTER ACADEMY | $28,060 |
| NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| WOMENS FOUNDATION OF BOSTON | $13,400 |
| PIONEER INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| NEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC | $10,000 |
| AQUIDNECK LAND TRUST | $10,000 |
| MASSART - MASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | $8,400 |
| SOCCER UNITY PROJECT | $5,000 |
| NORMAN BIRD SANCTUARY | $5,000 |
| THE CAMPHILL SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART | $2,500 |
| THE PUBLIC THEATER | $2,330 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
HUNTINGTON THEATRE CO INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +139%- TBTHE BASEBALL INC6× · 2017–2023 · $259k · revenue +55%
- MCMassachusetts College of Art and Design Foundation Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $112k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- WBWATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +159%
- RCROANOKE COLLEGE CAMPAIGNone grant, 2018 · $50k
NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +108%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUNTINGTON THEATRE CO INC ↗
- Who funds The Food Project Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds AQUIDNECK ISLAND LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts College of Art and Design Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SITE SANTA FE ↗
- Who funds WATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
- Who funds FOODCORPS INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PIONEER INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE ODYSSEY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING ↗
- Who funds NORTH HILL NEEDHAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOMA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds ABOUT FRESH INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Seal Legacy Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMONWEALTH KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds HEADING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE FOR A NEW COMMONWEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds The Farm School Inc ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPHILL SCHOOL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Fidelity Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Van Beuren Charitable Foundation Inc · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bigbird Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Beyond Domestic Violence Inc — 53% of income from government
- Justice Resource Institute Inc — 48% of income from government
- On the Rise Inc — 39% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Mattapan Community Health Center Inc — 21% of income from government
- Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Farm School Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Commonwealth Kitchen Inc — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Soccer Unity Project Inc — 6% of income from government
- Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
- Huntington Theatre Co Inc — 4% of income from government
- Watertown Boys and Girls' Club Inc — 3% of income from government
- Handel and Haydn Society — 2% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boston Art Review Inc — 2% of income from government
- Urbanity Dance Inc — 1% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Crossroads for Kids Inc — 1% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Baseball Inc — 1% of income from government
- Beacon Academy Inc — 1% of income from government
- Emmanuel College — 0% of income from government
- Coolidge Corner Theatre Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.