Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bidart Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$111kYouth Development$46kHuman Services$46kHealth$13kHousing & Shelter$3k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$3,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$429k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KHSD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$16,000
TRANSFORMATIONS BY BAKERSFIELD ANGELS$3,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY$3,500
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD$3,500
KERN COUNTY 4-H CLUBS$3,500
VALLEY CENTER FOR THE BLIND$3,500
THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $4k → 18%THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $4k → 18%THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $4k → 18%THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$215k · 9 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$215k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-24%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +147%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +64%
  • TO
    THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +632%

Funded once

  • MA
    MASTERING ABILITIES RIDING EQUINES
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • GS
    Girl Scouts of Central California South Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bakersfield Arc Inc

assist developmentally disabled individuals.

Human Services
2
Independent Living Center of Kern County

The mission of Independent Living Center of Kern County is to empower people with disabilities to grow creatively, professionally, and personally; and to educate the community about disability related issues. The vision of Independent…

Human Services
3
Bakersfield Recovery Services

Provide residential and outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse.

Health
4
Berkeley Community Scholars Dba Berkeley Community Fund

Berkeley Community Scholars empowers Berkeley youth who face racial, economic, and other barriers to achieving their college dreams by providing a unique experience of scholarships, advising, mentoring, and a community of support.

Philanthropy
5
Bakersfield Kern Regional Homeless Collaborative

To end homelessness in kern county through collaborative planning and action.

Human Services
6
Greater Bakersfield Chamber of Commerce

Provide support, networking, and education to the business community of bakersfield and kern county.

—
7
Kern County Library Foundation
Education
8
Baker Family Foundation of California

To serve individuals and families by providing them with the charitable and educational resources needed to overcome hardship and improve their lives, health and career.

Philanthropy
9
Outward Bound California

The purpose of this corporation is to help people of all ages and walks of life build personal strengths needed to succeed in life, through operating challenging experiential learning courses and programs in school, urban and wilderness…

Recreation & Sports
10
Bakersfield Arc Foundation

to raise general operating capital for bakersfield arc, inc., so that bakersfield arc, inc. can focus on improving the quality of life for adults with developmental disabilities.

Health
11
Kern County Cancer Foundation

Dedicated to assisting kern county residents who need financial assistance in obtaining treatment for cancer and associated diseases.

Health
12
Legacy Behavioral Services Inc

To unlock the potential of families and individuals. to develop employees that model integrity and healthy living. to build a legacy for all of our clients.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Boys and Girls Clubs of Kern County; the most unlike its peers is Girl Scouts of Central California South Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KHSD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $105,000 · OtherKHSD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONKERN COUNTY 4-H CLUBS: $22,500 · OtherKERN COUNTY 4-H CLUBSTransformations by Bakersfield Angels: $10,500 · OtherTransformations by Bakersfield Angels+3 more: $6,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD: $22,500 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE …THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $12,500 · Human ServicesTHE OPEN DOOR NETW…THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY: $22,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS AN…VALLEY CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $10,500 · HealthBAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Education
Other$144,000Human Services$35,000Youth Development$22,500Health$10,500Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD: $22,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $10,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTransformations by Bakersfield Angels: $10,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of Central California South Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD ↗
  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds Transformations by Bakersfield Angels ↗
  • Who funds BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Central California South Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Virginia and Alfred Harrell FoundationCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation · Kern Community Foundation · Resnick Foundation · CARE - Childrens Advocates Resource Endowment · Valley Strong Cu Fka Kern Schools Federal Credit Union · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bidart Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bidart Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bidart Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bidart Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bidart Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph